U.S. crafting framework for cyber offense: general

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:57pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States is still crafting a legal framework to guide any offensive moves in cyberspace, months after the Pentagon unveiled a broad cyber strategy, the head of the military command responsible for such operations said on Tuesday.

Deliberations on military doctrine and legal framework are "ongoing," Air Force General Robert Kehler, commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, told a defense writers' group. "I would say it's not completed."

Kehler has overall responsibility for the U.S. Cyber Command, a sub-unit that began operating in May 2010.

Its mission is to protect Defense Department networks and, if ordered, to go on the offensive to make sure the United States retains the ability to use digitally networked systems on land, at sea and in the air.

He said the military was still looking at "what kinds of options would we want to be able to offer" policymakers for going on the offense.

One of the issues is what constitutes "active defense" in cyberspace, he said, equating it with actions that a ship's captain is authorized to take at sea to protect a ship.

"Is active defense really offense in cyberspace?" Kehler asked. "I would argue that it really is not. It does not have to be, for sure. But those are the issues that we are trying to work our way through."

The Defense Department unveiled in July the broad outlines of a strategy for protecting its more than 15,000 computer networks. The strategy defined cyberspace as an "operational domain" that U.S. forces will be trained to defend, like air, sea and land.

COUNTRIES CREATE MILITARY CYBER UNITS

Then-Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn said the Pentagon wanted to avoid militarizing cyberspace, but aimed to secure strategic networks with the threat of retaliation, as well as by mounting a more robust defense.

"Our strategy's overriding emphasis is on denying the benefit of an attack," Lynn said in a July 14 speech at the National Defense University. "If an attack will not have its intended effect, those who wish us harm will have less reason to target us through cyberspace in the first place."

The U.S. Defense Department has said that it expects cyberattacks to be a "significant component" of future conflicts. More than 30 countries are creating cyber units in their militaries, Lynn wrote in a September 28 piece on ForeignAffairs.com just before stepping down this month.

Cyber technologies now exist that are capable of destroying critical networks, causing physical damage by playing havoc with industrial control systems and altering key systems' performance.

Kehler in his remarks Tuesday said cyberspace is a place "through which we'll conduct military activity, similar to every other domain."

Asked how U.S. cyber capabilities measured against potential adversaries such as Russia and China, he said: "I believe the that the United States still has an edge."

"I can't describe how great the edge is," Kehler said. "I can tell you in some places I think we have quite an edge in cyberspace." He declined to elaborate.

Kehler suggested debate may be continuing on whether electronic warfare -- in which the electromagnetic spectrum is used against targets such as radio towers, radars and other services -- could be construed as a form of cyber warfare.

"I think you could say no," he said. "We've done electronic warfare for years and years and years and years."

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
electric38 wrote:
Well, which is it offensive or defensive? Who polices them???? The trillions of dollars in taxpayer money wasted on military “offensives”, while many of the children in our nation, are moving below the poverty level and without health care is unjustified. Our “economic ship” is sinking while they play with their expensive toys.
Sad to say, this Cyber network can easily promote itself by allowing the military to manipulate the press to a greater degree than it it already does – similar to the way computer internet security companies create viruses” so people will purchase their “cures”.

Oct 19, 2011 1:56am EDT  --  Report as abuse
gAnton wrote:
Any law that’s passed should apply to all government employes and especially to military personnel. Any American citizen should be able to lay charges against violators of the law. The law should be administered solely by non-government persons.

Oct 19, 2011 11:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.