After Ohio panic, call for ban on exotic animal ownership

CHICAGO Thu Oct 20, 2011 6:52pm EDT

A view of the barn from the entrance to Terry Thompson's property, where exotic animals were kept, in Zanesville, Ohio October 20, 2011. REUTERS/Matt Sullivan

A view of the barn from the entrance to Terry Thompson's property, where exotic animals were kept, in Zanesville, Ohio October 20, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Matt Sullivan

Related Topics

U.S. Secret Service provide security for President Barack Obama in Pensacola, Florida, June 15, 2010. REUTERS/Jim Young

Protecting the President

The Secret Service detail surrounding President Obama.  Slideshow 

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Animal welfare groups pleaded on Thursday for tighter restrictions or a ban on private ownership of exotic animals after a panic in Ohio this week when scores of dangerous beasts were set loose.

Police hunted down and killed dozens of lions, tigers, bears, and primates set loose from a private menagerie on Tuesday by owner Terry Thompson, 62, who then killed himself.

"This latest incident simply puts an exclamation point on our call to stop the private ownership of dangerous, wild animals as pets or roadside attractions," Wayne Pacelle, president and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States, said in a conference call.

"These animals do not belong in people's backyards or bedrooms or basements," Pacelle said.

Seven states, including Ohio, have no ban on owning exotic animals. The others are Alabama, Nevada, North Carolina, West Virginia, South Carolina and Wisconsin.

Federal law regulates the interstate transport of big cats, but states regulate their ownership. A similar federal law on the transport of primates failed to pass Congress. A U.S. government agency is drafting a proposal on the transport of some snakes.

The animals involved in the Ohio incident might have been taken away earlier if Ohio authorities had enforced a lapsed rule put in place in January by former Democratic Governor Ted Strickland. The rule banned private breeding or purchase of exotic animals and stripped ownership rights from someone such as Thompson convicted of animal cruelty, Pacelle said.

The rule was allowed to expire after 90 days by Republican Governor John Kasich amid doubts whether the state could restrict ownership of any non-native wild animals.

Pacelle said the emergency in Zanesville, Ohio, in which schools were closed and residents told to remain inside, showed the necessity for the emergency rule or similar legislation.

The rule was correct in principle but it was "sloppy" and not enforceable, Kasich spokesman Rob Nichols said on Thursday. The rule made no provision for what to do with any seized animals.

Kasich earlier set up a task force on the issue which will make recommendations in about a month, his spokesman said.

"This is much bigger than Ohio," Pacelle said. "I would hazard to guess that we're talking about tens of thousands of dangerous exotic animals in our communities."

He and other animal welfare experts said Ohio was one of the centers for the lucrative U.S. trade in exotic animals that is largely an American phenomenon. There are thousands of captive tigers in Texas alone, more than live in the wild.

Lobbying by groups espousing private ownership, and by the pet trade that fears restrictions will be placed on purchases of animals like geckos, has often succeeded in blocking efforts to pass such laws, Pacelle said.

The Ohio Association of Animal Owners Inc said on its web site that supporters should be prepared to block legislation as they have for the past 20 years. A message left with the group was not returned.

Joe Maynard, a board member of the Zoological Association of America, a group that accredits private breeders and some government-operated zoos, said people like Thompson should be barred from owning exotic animals because he violated animal cruelty laws.

"We recognize regulations are needed. I don't think a ban is necessary," Maynard said. "A knee-jerk response to this incident may hurt everyone, not just us."

(Additional reporting by Lily Kuo in Washington and Jim Leckrone in Columbus; Editing by Greg McCune)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
DrJJJJ wrote:
Or a ban on alcohol, monster debt and big egos!

Oct 20, 2011 7:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
OldWarDog wrote:
Does the ban include owning and wearing their pelts? If it does, it’ll never get past the ruling one percent.

Oct 20, 2011 7:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Suason wrote:
These precious, exotic animals belong only in the wild! Instead of protecting the rights of humans to own them we should be protecting the habitats these creatures originated from so that there aren’t more tigers in Texas than in the wild. This is not only for the individual animal’s sake but for the entire planet’s sake. Eco-systems all over the world are on the verge of collapsing because of habitat loss, pollution, climate change, invasive species and, mostly, human over-population. Humans are creating a huge imbalance in Nature and we are on the verge of the sixth Mass Extinction. See:

Oct 20, 2011 7:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.