Jobs refused cancer treatment too long: biographer

Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:52pm EDT

Apple CEO Steve Jobs gestures during his unveiling of the iPhone 4 at the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference in San Francisco, California, in this June 7, 2010 file photo.   REUTERS/Robert Galbraith/Files

Apple CEO Steve Jobs gestures during his unveiling of the iPhone 4 at the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference in San Francisco, California, in this June 7, 2010 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith/Files

(Reuters) - Apple Inc co-founder Steve Jobs revolutionized multiple industries with his cutting-edge products but he was not the world's best manager, biographer Walter Isaacson said.

Jobs changed the course of personal computing during two stints at Apple and then brought a revolution to the mobile market but the inspiring genius is known for his hard edges that have often times alienated colleagues and early investors with his my-way-or-the-highway dictums.

"He's not warm and fuzzy," Isaacson said in an interview with "60 Minutes" on CBS on Sunday. "He was not the world's greatest manager. In fact, he could have been one of the world's worst managers."

"He could be very, very mean to people at times," he added.

Jobs loved to argue but not everyone around him shared that passion, which drove some of his top people away. While his style had yielded breakthrough products, it didn't make for "great management style," Isaacson said.

In one of the more than 40 interviews that Jobs gave the biographer, the technology icon said he felt totally comfortable being brutally honest.

"That's the ante for being in the room. So we're brutally honest with each other and all of them can tell me they think I'm full of s**t, and I can tell anyone I think they're full of s**t," Jobs said. "And we've had some rip-roaring arguments where we're yelling at each other."

Isaacson's biography "Steve Jobs," which hits bookstores on Monday, reveals that Jobs refused potentially life-saving cancer surgery for nine months, was bullied in school, tried various quirky diets as a teenager, and exhibited early strange behavior such as staring at others without blinking.

The book is expected to paint an unprecedented, no-holds-barred portrait of a man who famously guarded his privacy fiercely but whose death ignited a global outpouring of grief and tribute.

Isaacson said in the interview that the reality distortion theory that had always been associated with Jobs stemmed from the Apple co-founder's belief that he was special and that the rules didn't apply to him.

'MAGICAL THINKING'

"He could drive himself by magical thinking," Isaacson said. "By believing something that the rest of us couldn't possibly believe, and sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't."

Jobs, who has revolutionized the world of personal computers, animated movies, music, phones, tablet, digital publishing and retail stores, would have liked to conquer television as well, Isaacson said.

"He had a few other visions. He would love to make an easy-to-use television set," said Isaacson, speaking of Job's last two-and-a-half years of life. "But he started focusing on his family again as well. And it was a painful brutal struggle. And he would talk, often to me about the pain."

Jobs, in his final meeting with Isaacson in mid-August, still held out hope that there might be one new drug that could save him. He also wanted to believe in God and an afterlife.

"Ever since I've had cancer, I've been thinking about (God) more. And I find myself believing a bit more. Maybe it's because I want to believe in an afterlife. That when you die, it doesn't just all disappear," Isaacson quoted Jobs as saying.

"Then he paused for a second and he said 'yeah, but sometimes I think it's just like an on-off switch. Click and you're gone," Isaacson said of Jobs. "He paused again, and he said: And that's why I don't like putting on-off switches on Apple devices."

(Editing by Anshuman Daga)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
m_thomas wrote:
Mr. Isaacson is a writer and biographer, not a medical doctor or metaphysician. I honor Steve Jobs’s personal choice. He braved a medical system and society that refuses to acknowledge the merits of alternative medicine or spiritual healing. I too would act as Jobs, as did my wife with cancer. Of course, the world is against anything that doesn’t match the prevailing allopathic therapies; and no one questions those therapies when they fail.

No one can declare Mr. Jobs’ life would have been prolonged or saved “if he only he had…” This is specious gossip.

Walter Isaacson, good luck with your book, but please don’t second-guess Steven Jobs or judge the integrity of the choices he made. You are not qualified.

Oct 20, 2011 9:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ex-Patriot wrote:
Jobs epitomizes an era of greed and short sightedness. He was clearly a person who just happened to be in the right place at the right time. The people around him are the geniuses (i.e. Woz), not Jobs. The world is a much better without the added constraints he would have wanted to bring to it. Apple’s choice not to license and guarding patents with lawyers stifles technology. Jobs was a greedy man leading an equally greedy company. The result is overpriced items which lack key areas of interoperability.

Oct 20, 2011 12:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Bensony wrote:
If it’s true that Mr Jobs sought proper cancer treatment a bit later than optimum it is regrettable. If the reason was that he spent some time seeking alternative treatment then there is a lesson. He should have taken conventional treatment (namely surgery and chemo and radiotherapy) and alternative treatment at the same time. As someone well versed with alternative medicine, especially traditional Chinese medicine, I can say with some certainty that no alternative medicine has any worthy probability of stopping a progressing carcinoma. Proper use of TCM can help to alleviate the symptoms and complications of a cancer but will not be enough to stop it on its track. It must be used alongside conventional oncological therapy. If surgery and chemo and/or radiotherapy is still a viable option, then go for it. Alternative treatment should be used to help the treatment not as the sole form of treatment.

Oct 21, 2011 5:06am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.