Mobile phones don't hike cancer risk: Danish study

LONDON Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:06am EDT

A man speaks on his mobile phone while standing on a boat on the River Thames with Canary Wharf and the financial district of London seen in the background. REUTERS/Toby Melville

A man speaks on his mobile phone while standing on a boat on the River Thames with Canary Wharf and the financial district of London seen in the background.

Credit: Reuters/Toby Melville

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - Mobile phones do not increase the risk of cancer, according to a large study involving more than 350,000 people by Danish researchers published Friday.

The results, released on the British Medical Journal's website, chime with a series of other studies that have reached similar conclusions.

Scientists from the Institute of Cancer Epidemiology in Copenhagen looked at people aged at least 30 who subscribed to mobile phone contracts and compared their rates of brain tumors with non-subscribers between 1990 and 2007.

Outside experts said the large scale of the trial was impressive.

"This paper supports most other reports which do not find any detrimental effects of phone use under normal exposures," said Malcolm Sperrin, director of Medical Physics at Britain's Royal Berkshire Hospital and Fellow of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

At the end of May, the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer decided cellphone use should be classified as "possibly carcinogenic to humans," putting then in the same category as lead, chloroform and coffee.

But just over a month later the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection's committee on epidemiology said the scientific evidence increasingly pointed away from a link between mobile phone use and brain tumors.

The number of mobile phones has risen hugely since the early 1980s, with nearly 5 billion handsets in use today, prompting lengthy debate about their potential link to the main types of brain tumor, glioma and meningioma.

(Reporting by Ben Hirschler; Editing by Hans-Juergen Peters)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
mhenrym wrote:
These studies are misleading, because result error from these studies is very big that is not allowing to make such conclusion. Such studies should be performed in laboratory on cellular/molecular level with controlled exposure of RF radiation similar to cell phone radiation.

Oct 21, 2011 9:16am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Slammy wrote:
For decades some of the most well respected and top notch doctors in the world said there was no proven link between cigarettes and cancer. Go figure.

Oct 21, 2011 5:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
sunnytoo wrote:
According to the radiology journals, cellphone use causes the brain to use more glucose, search around for yourself in the professionaljournals.
Never get injected with the poison metal Gadolinium used for magnetic resonance scanners. You can get a plain exam, or an xray. less costly too. Gadolinium is poison when it breaks down inside you, worse if you have renal deficiency or failure. Always check eGFR, not creatinine levels. search mri-side-effects.com you’ll see.

Oct 21, 2011 5:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures