Iraq still seeking U.S. trainers: PM Maliki

BAGHDAD Sat Oct 22, 2011 2:38pm EDT

Iraq's Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki speaks during an interview with Reuters in Baghdad October 9, 2011. REUTERS/Mohammed Ameen

Iraq's Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki speaks during an interview with Reuters in Baghdad October 9, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Mohammed Ameen

Related Video

Related Topics

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq will continue talks with Washington on how U.S. trainers can work with Iraqi forces after a complete withdrawal of American troops at the end of the year, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said on Saturday.

U.S. President Barack Obama announced on Friday that all U.S. troops would leave Iraq as scheduled by the end of this year after the two governments failed to reach an agreement over giving American soldiers legal immunity.

"Now that we have put this behind us, this will let us settle the issue of training," Maliki said. "Iraqis will ask to resume talks over the number of trainers, the duration (of their stay in Iraq) and how those trainers will be used."

More than eight years after the invasion to topple Saddam Hussein, violence has fallen since the sectarian slaughter of 2006-2007. But Iraq still faces a stubborn Sunni Islamist insurgency tied to al Qaeda and rival Shi'ite militias.

U.S. and Iraqi officials say the local armed forces can contain violence but they need trainers to help build up air defense, maritime capabilities, intelligence gathering and moving the military to conventional warfare tactics.

Iraq will get some military training from a U.S. embassy program and from contractors who are part of a package with the U.S.-made military hardware Baghdad is purchasing, such as F-16 fighter jets and tanks.

Military advisers working at the embassy are covered by diplomatic immunity afforded to the State Department.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said on Saturday that U.S. commitment to the democratic future of Iraq remains strong despite the decision to go ahead with the withdrawal of American troops as scheduled.

"Even as our troops come home, the United States's commitment to Iraq's future as a secure, stable, democratic nation remains as strong as ever," she said at a news conference in the Tajik capital. "This will end the war and it will open a new chapter in our relationship."

Clinton said Washington expected to have a "significant" security training presence at the Baghdad embassy.

Washington had hoped a few thousand troops in Iraq would help buttress its stability and offset the influence of neighboring Iran. U.S. officials initially had sought Baghdad's approval for around 3,400 troops.

Many Iraqis are worried about their country's stability and security without the buffer of U.S. military presence, and fear Iraq may slip back into the sectarian tensions that pushed the country to the brink of civil conflict.

(Writing by Patrick Markey; Editing by Michael Roddy)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
Kinnison wrote:
After all this time if the Iraqi Army is still not trained up to speed all of the American trainers in the armed forces won’t be able to do the job. Make a clean break and bring all of our troops home. If we leave or send trainers we are handing the Iraqis hostages, because there will be no U.S. combat forces to bail them out if they get into trouble. Remember Mogadishu?

Oct 22, 2011 2:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:
Iraq, for many months, has refused to provide “immunity” to American Military personnel. That was a primary condition by the US, in order to keep some of our troops in-country.

It is entirely Iraq’s fault that this happened. The US finally ran out of patience with their idiocy, and rightfully so!

Oct 22, 2011 3:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
banjo123 wrote:
Obama had not gotten anything right until he agreed to bring the troops home. Given his weak showing as a leader I suspect the Iraqi PM will simply tell him “NO” you will not bring the troops home. Obama will tuck his tail between his legs and crawl back out of site leaving the troops min Iraqi. Come on 2012; we the people need to pull the Obama troops out of the White House!

Oct 22, 2011 3:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures