WikiLeaks says "blockade" threatens its existence

LONDON Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:21pm EDT

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange speaks during a news conference at the Frontline Club in London October 24, 2011.  REUTERS/Luke MacGregor

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange speaks during a news conference at the Frontline Club in London October 24, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Luke MacGregor

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - WikiLeaks will have to stop publishing secret cables and devote itself to fund-raising if it is unable to end a financial "blockade" by U.S. firms such as Visa and MasterCard by the end of the year, founder Julian Assange said on Monday.

After releasing tens of thousands of confidential U.S. government cables, WikiLeaks needs $3.5 million over the next year to continue operating, Assange said.

Visa and MasterCard stopped processing donations for WikiLeaks in December 2010 after the United States criticized the organization's release of thousands of sensitive U.S. diplomatic cables from its embassies all over the world.

In the 24 hours before credit card donations were blocked, the organization said it had received $135,000. Now, it is receiving on average about 7,000 euros ($9,700)a month.

Assange said there were no lawful grounds for the blockade by Bank of America Corp, Visa Inc, MasterCard Inc, eBay Inc unit PayPal and Western Union Co, which he said had cost Wikileaks 95 percent of its revenue.

"If WikiLeaks does not find a way to remove this blockade, given our current levels of expenditure, we will simply not be able to continue by the turn of the year," Assange told a news conference.

In July, WikiLeaks filed a complaint to the Directorate-General for Competition of the European Commission, saying Visa and MasterCard had breached antitrust provisions set out by the EU Treaty.

Assange, who is fighting extradition from Britain to Sweden, where he faces allegations of sexual misconduct, said he hoped the European Commission would make a decision to hold a full investigation by mid-November.

In interviews last year, Assange said WikiLeaks had extensive internal documents from a bank, believed to be Bank of America, an announcement that knocked 3 percent off the value of the bank's shares.

However, on Monday he said this data was now out of WikiLeaks' hands and in the possession of an unnamed suspended WikiLeaks employee.

"At this stage, we do not believe, unfortunately, that we will regain that material, which is a great loss," he said.

Daniel Domscheit-Berg, who last year was fired by Assange as WikiLeaks' co-spokesman, told Reuters in August that he had destroyed about 3,000 submissions that WikiLeaks had received relating to Bank of America.

(Editing by Kevin Liffey)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (27)
jalee wrote:
Too bad! The damage that this site has caused is terrible.

Oct 24, 2011 11:12am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Pretty sure the US government would be glad to see Assange close his publications down. In fact, that was the point all along. No matter your opinion on what Wikileaks does, it has the power to keep all governments honest, and, of course, that is simply unacceptable.

Oct 24, 2011 11:20am EDT  --  Report as abuse
MarketForce wrote:
Well, the first step in getting around this would be changing your Paypal and credit card username. Their old one (“wikileaks@world-hackterrorists”) is probably a dead give-away. I’m no computer genius, but maybe something more common like “momlove4151″ would turn that red flag into a denim dress. Just a thought.

Oct 24, 2011 11:34am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.