Rajaratnam says U.S. pushed to turn on friend: report

Galleon hedge fund founder Raj Rajaratnam departs Manhattan Federal Court after his sentencing in New York October 13, 2011.  REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Galleon hedge fund founder Raj Rajaratnam departs Manhattan Federal Court after his sentencing in New York October 13, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

NEW YORK | Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:58pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Just weeks before fallen hedge fund tycoon Raj Rajaratnam was sentenced to 11 years in prison for insider trading, U.S. prosecutors pressed him to turn on his friend, former Goldman Sachs Group Inc director Rajat Gupta, Newsweek Daily Beast reported.

In his first interview about his case, Rajaratnam was quoted as saying that he was initially asked on the day of his October 16, 2009 arrest to "wear a wire" and record conversations with Gupta, also a longtime global head of elite consultancy McKinsey & Co.

The article, posted at bit.ly/oSXZ8T, said prosecutors asked Sri Lankan-born Rajaratnam again as late as two weeks before his October 13 sentencing in Manhattan federal court.

"They wanted me to plea bargain," it quotes the Galleon Group founder as saying, in an interview at his Manhattan apartment where he is under house arrest. "They want to get Rajat. I am not going to do what people did to me. Rajat has four daughters."

The opinion of a Sri Lankan astrologist combined with a history of suspected persecution led to Rajaratnam's decision to fight the case, despite extensive phone taps and other overwhelming evidence, the report said.

"He (the astrologer) said that eventually I would prevail," Rajaratnam, 54, was quoted by the The Daily Beast as saying.

A spokeswoman for Rajaratnam's lawyers at law firm Akin Gump declined to comment on Monday.

Ellen Davis, a spokeswoman for the office of the Manhattan U.S. Attorney, said in an emailed statement: "This article appears to be based on an interview with Mr. Rajaratnam and a number of his assertions are inaccurate."

A spokesman for Gupta's lawyer, Gary Naftalis, referred to previous statements that his client had done nothing wrong and that a civil case brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was baseless.

The insider-trading investigation featured extensive use of secret FBI phone taps. Such tactics usually are reserved for Mafia and drug trafficking investigations, but the hedge fund manager and several of his South Asian business associates and friends were recorded or agreed to be recorded.

Rajaratnam, the central figure in a sprawling insider trading case, was convicted by a jury in May on all 14 criminal charges he faced. His 11-year prison sentence is the longest ever in an insider-trading case. He must report to prison on November 28.

Rajaratnam told the newspaper he respected the U.S. justice system.

"In Sri Lanka I would have given the judge 50,000 rupees and he'd be sitting having dinner at my house," Rajaratnam was quoted as saying. "Here, I got my shot. The American justice system is by and large fair."

The case is USA v Raj Rajaratnam et al, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 09-01184.

(Reporting by Grant McCool; Editing by Tim Dobbyn and Gerald E. McCormick)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
DEVONECO wrote:
The bloody arrogant S.O.B. This fellow is no millionaire or billionaire. He’s from a very middle class family in Sri Lanka with no financial resources. He’s just a coolie for the LTTE that launders their ill-gotten monies. His modus operandi is like this : 1. Raj Rajaratnam moves to USA with his family. 2. His father establishes Tamil Sangam; 3. Raj Rajaratnam establishes the Galleon Group; 4. LTTE has huge sums of money in their coffers acquired through bank robberies, forcible extortion from their own Tamil people, prostitution, drug smuggling, human trafficking and Credit card scams; 5. LTTE transfers millions to the Tamil Sangam; 6. Tamil Sangam “invests” millions with Galleon Group; 7. Galleon Group makes huge profits through various financial scams (as proved now); 8. Galleon Group transfers these profits to the Tamil Sangam as their dividends; 9. Tamil Sangam “donates” large sums of these monies to the TRO (Tamil Rehabilitation Organization) which is one of LTTE’s “procurement arms” based in USA; 10. TRO purchases arms and weapons for the LTTE. Raj Rajaratnam is nothing but a cheap crook and terrorist masquerading as a billionaire rolling in “blood money”!

Oct 24, 2011 12:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
DEVONECO wrote:
He doesn’t have to bribe anyone in Sri Lanka. He’s already rubbing shoulders with several powerful US politicians he has “bribed” with his “blood money” which he has “apparently” donated as “campaign funds”! (You can find who they are if you google!!!!!) Also check the following link : http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/raj-rajaratnam-indicted-20-million-insider-trading-case/story?id=8845975

Oct 24, 2011 12:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ChrisKay wrote:
With regard to Rajaratnam’s comment about Sri Lankan justice system, I completely agree with him. I am a Sri Lankan Singhalese, but feel so ashamed of what goes on in Sri Lankan legal system. It is as corrupt as any other in the developing world. We hope this will someday come to an end. On the other hand I must comment on Rajaratnam’s disgraceful conduct and behaviour – an indelible stain in his make-up of being a crook – probably what he has gained after leaving Sri Lanka as a youngster and gaining what he has from the former colonial masters – the British.

Oct 24, 2011 1:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.