Judge blocks part of North Carolina abortion law

WINSTON-SALEM, North Carolina Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:54pm EDT

Related Topics

WINSTON-SALEM, North Carolina (Reuters) - North Carolina cannot require abortion providers to show and describe to pregnant women images from ultrasounds performed before the procedures, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday.

U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles temporarily halted that part of the state's new abortion law, set to take effect on Wednesday. The judge ruled that those challenging the law had shown they were likely to prove that the provision violated their constitutional rights.

The provision requires abortion providers to perform an ultrasound at least four hours before the procedure and to describe to the patient the images seen on the ultrasound. Providers also must offer pregnant women a chance to hear the fetal heartbeat.

The judge left in place other portions of the law, including a provision that imposes a 24-hour waiting period before an abortion.

Several North Carolina physicians and health care providers sued on behalf of themselves and their patients, arguing that the ultrasound requirements forced them to deliver the state's message discouraging abortions against their will.

"Today the court stood on the side of women and health care providers who are faced with personal, private and very complicated medical decisions every day," said Melissa Reed, vice president for public policy at Planned Parenthood Health Systems, one of the plaintiffs.

Opponents of the law said they were confident that they would prevail in having the ultrasound provision thrown out for good.

Barbara Holt, president of North Carolina Right to Life and a supporter of the new law, said she was encouraged that the judge allowed most of it to go into effect but disappointed that the ultrasound requirements were blocked.

The state contends the ultrasound requirements would help protect the psychological health of patients and prevent coerced abortions.

"We are confident that the courts, upon further review, will allow the ultrasound provision to go into effect," she said.

The state's Republican-led General Assembly passed the new abortion restrictions this summer, overriding a veto by Democratic Governor Bev Perdue.

North Carolina is the third state to approve a law requiring that a woman be shown an ultrasound before her abortion, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights, an abortion rights organization. Similar requirements in Texas and Oklahoma also have been blocked by courts.

(Additional reporting by Ned Barnett; Editing by Greg McCune)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
UnHueMan wrote:
Thankfully we have the judicial system to stop the right wing’s attacks on women’s rights across the country. So much for less government in the personal lives of Americans where the right tries to force unnecessary medical procedures onto women and stepping into the middle of a doctor-patient relationship. Here I thought the right ran on jobs in 2010. Instead we get guns in bars and anti-abortion bills across the nation. I can see the unemployment dropping like flies with this type of legislation coming from the Red States. Nice to see that the right is so concerned about jobs in this country. So how’s the states going Red along with the House in the last election treating everyone.

Oct 25, 2011 9:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Absurdity wrote:
Talk about “regulations” and all in these “conservative” states. What is it that we always hear about regulation and government from the Republicans? Get the government out of the way.

They also like to say we need a smaller government. I say in what way? The amount it spends, the number of buildings it occupies, the number of laws created, how? But if they, the conservatives”, believe this, then why do they keep running for office?

Oct 26, 2011 6:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
tmpiers wrote:
These ultrasound and heartbeat laws are nothing, but bully actics to guilt women into having babies they don’t want. They are already going through a hard enough time as it is and don’t need this.

Oct 27, 2011 12:56pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.