Wealth and Investing Center

Ford's lackluster outlook disappoints

Related Video

A Ford truck sits for sale under an American flag at a dealership lot in Encinitas, California July 25, 2011.     REUTERS/Mike Blake

A Ford truck sits for sale under an American flag at a dealership lot in Encinitas, California July 25, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Blake

DETROIT | Wed Oct 26, 2011 3:56pm EDT

DETROIT (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co (F.N) posted a lower third-quarter profit after taking a hit from plunging metals prices and sustaining losses in its European and Asian operations.

The No. 2 U.S. automaker also cut its 2011 profit margin forecast, suggesting a weaker-than-expected fourth quarter. It cited slowing growth in China, pricing pressure in Europe and provided no timetable for when it might resume paying a long-anticipated dividend.

Ford shares fell as much as 7.2 percent on Wednesday before recovering some losses.

Investors and analysts had been looking to the earnings report as a turning point where the automaker could detail plans to pay its first dividend since it slid into crisis in 2006. Ford has posted profits for 10 straight quarters.

The quarter included a noncash charge of about $350 million to write down the value of hedges Ford had taken to offset the risk of rising raw material costs. Instead, the cost of aluminum, copper and precious metals fell sharply in September as concerns about weaker global growth mounted.

Falling commodity costs led to similar writedowns this quarter by discount carriers Southwest Airlines Co (LUV.N) and JetBlue Airways Corp (JBLU.O), and manufacturer Eaton Corp (ETN.N).

A decline in raw material costs was supposed to help profits, however, Jefferies analyst Peter Nesvold said. "Investors are showing some frustration that even as raw material costs are coming down it's not benefiting EPS."

Ford said the charge will either reverse if commodity prices rise or be offset by lower parts costs over the next 18 months.

The company's U.S. market share in 2011 is essentially flat near 17 percent, failing to repeat last year's gain of 2 percentage points over 2009.

On Tuesday, influential watchdog Consumer Reports said Ford fell to 20th place from 10th place in its vehicle reliability study.

"With general economic concerns, the quality issues Ford has had and Japanese competitors ramping up production, the company has its work cut out for it heading into 2012," Edward Jones analyst Matt Collins said.

Analysts gave the quarter lukewarm reviews, with J.P. Morgan calling it "so-so" and Citi describing the results as "a bit messier than expected."

Revenue rose 14 percent to $33.1 billion. But net income slipped to $1.65 billion, or 41 cents per share, down from $1.69 billion or 43 cents per share a year earlier.

Excluding one-time items, Ford earned 46 cents per share, 2 cents higher than what analysts polled by Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S had forecast.

The company also cut its 2011 outlook for its automotive profit margin, saying it now expects 5.7 percent, down from 6.5 percent through the first three quarters. Last year, Ford's margin was 6.1 percent and it had previously forecast it would match or beat that level.

J.P. Morgan analyst Himanshu Patel said Ford's margin outlook implied a fourth-quarter profit of 23 cents a share. Analysts were expecting 32 cents.

Another disappointment for investors was the lack of news about a dividend, Jefferies' Nesvold said.

Ford Chief Financial Officer Lewis Booth refused to be drawn into specifics on a payout. "We're on record as saying we'd like to pay a dividend sooner rather than later."

He reiterated Ford could restart a dividend before it regains an investment-grade credit rating.

LOSSES IN EUROPE, ASIA

While Ford posted a pretax profit of $1.55 billion in North America as U.S. auto sales steadied over the summer and avoided the renewed slump some analysts had feared, losses were reported for Asia and Europe.

In Asia and Africa, the pretax operating loss was $43 million, compared with a $30 million profit last year. Ford said slowing growth in China contributed to the shortfall.

In Europe, Ford saw its loss widen to $306 million from $196 million a year ago. Booth said the caution for Ford's outlook partly reflected the risk of a competitive crunch in a region where automakers sacrifice margin by offering deeper discounts and by turning to lower-margin sales to fleet operators like rental agencies.

"The pressure is really on margins in Europe," he said of the auto industry.

The tough environment in Europe was reflected by the profit warning and job cuts on Wednesday by French automaker PSA Peugeot Citroen (PEUP.PA).

Ford said recent floods in Thailand have cut fourth-quarter production so far by 17,000 vehicles due to supplier problems, but the company's plant was unaffected.

The company forecast its fourth-quarter global production at 1.37 million vehicles, up 22,000 from a year ago.

In North America, fourth-quarter production will be 660,000 vehicles, up 15,000 from its previous forecast. Of this total, about two-thirds will be trucks and sport-utility vehicles and a third will be passenger cars, Booth said.

Costs related to the contract ratification by Ford's 41,000 unionized U.S. factory workers were not reflected in the third-quarter results. Those costs will be reflected in fourth-quarter results, Booth said.

Ford lowered its automotive debt by $1.3 billion in the quarter, to $12.7 billion. Ford's debt-reduction efforts will save about $1 billion in interest payments in 2011 compared with 2010.

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Jrob wrote:
Go Ford!!! I knew you would come back. Back when stock was $3 a share, Ford refused the government’s loan. Look at them now. Makes me proud to be American..

Oct 26, 2011 10:01am EDT  --  Report as abuse
johnsands wrote:
It’s good to know that FORD MOTER CO. is still making a profit. The executives were running a tight ship when the financial crisis hit. GM was not in such a good situation when the price of oil hit 147 dollars a barrel. They were manufacturing big trucks and SUV’s , both gas guzzelers.
Gasoline,Diesal and Jet fuel went up to 4$/gallon for a few months in 2008. Fuel did hit a new low after the money crisis, going down to 1.50$/ gallon.
Ford was lucky, they were selling small cars when gasoline got so expensive. Making the right cars at the right time. GM had to get government help of about 60 billion dollars, while Ford motors took no government money.
The Ford F150 TRUCKs are still well built and selling good.
JRA

Oct 26, 2011 10:55am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Jim5236 wrote:
Ford’s profits were the second highest ever, and revenue exceeded expectations by almost 15%. Wall Street’s criticism seems less valid and more to keep the price down for buying more this quarter. Why pay a dividend when you can buy back debt and make an immediate 7% return on the money. By paying down debt, they can will further lower borrowing costs as they are one rating away from becoming investment grade. They should get their house in order and only then pay a dividend from all the savings. Just by decreasing their debt last year they will save $1B in interest. They can pay a higher dividend if they wait another year. Anyone who wants a dividend will earn >6% if they buy FORD bonds. I’m seeing this kind of new coverage as traders’ noise to keep the stock price low till next year’s profit increases. Expect a big move up in Ford shares next year. Ford wouldn’t report high earnings this year when they just finished negotiating a contract with labor with so many concessions. Also expect Ford’s quality report to improve next year after sorting out Microsoft’s SYNC system. Microsoft has never heard of 6-sigma quality, but I hope they are getting a lesson in it.

Oct 26, 2011 1:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.