Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Best of Cannes

Style and scenes from the Cannes Film Festival.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Income of top 1 percent far outgrew others: report

Related Topics

A sign is seen across from protesters taking part in Occupy Phoenix demonstrate in Phoenix, Arizona October 17, 2011. REUTERS/Eric Thayer

A sign is seen across from protesters taking part in Occupy Phoenix demonstrate in Phoenix, Arizona October 17, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Eric Thayer

WASHINGTON | Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:07am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Incomes for the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans nearly tripled from 1979 to 2007, far outpacing income growth for all other groups, said a new report that underscored sharply increased U.S. income disparity.

As demonstrators nationwide protest the power of Wall Street and the wealthy, the Congressional Budget Office on Tuesday gave further evidence that, in the last three decades, the United States has become a far more unequal nation.

"For the 1 percent of the population with the highest income, average real after-tax household income grew by 275 percent between 1979 and 2007," said the report from the CBO, a nonpartisan budget and tax analysis arm of Congress.

The next-highest 19 percent of earners saw their income grow by 65 percent over the same period. Income grew by just under 40 percent for the 60 percent of the population in the middle, while the 20 percent at the bottom of the scale saw income growth of only about 18 percent, the report said.

The CBO's conclusions will likely figure in the debate over whether tax increases on the rich should play a role in cutting budget deficits and reducing the U.S. national debt.

"This report confirms what the American people already know," said Representative Sander Levin.

"The rules have been changed by the unfair tax policies of the last decade and our tax code is doing less to level the playing field than it was in the past."

Levin is the top Democrat on the U.S. House of Representatives' tax-writing Ways and Means Committee.

As a result of this uneven shift, income was substantially more skewed toward the very top of the income scale in 2007 than it was in 1979, CBO said.

So much so, it said, that in 2005-2007, just before the financial crisis, the top 20 percent of the population received more after-tax income than the entire bottom 80 percent.

CBO said it measured the period between 1979 and 2007 because those years both immediately preceded recessions, making for similar endpoints in the study.

(Reporting by Patrick Temple-West and Kevin Drawbaugh; editing by Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
Alexander_Sr wrote:
Not sure whu they have’nt, but the other 99% should go to war with the other 1%. Seems that the scales are lopsided and that the rich should start giving back to the nation that gave them the ability to become rich.

Oct 25, 2011 11:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Majick1 wrote:
WOW how can that be? The statistics MUST be wrong, we all know that the rich need tax breaks because the blue-collar workers and the elderly have become such a burden to their society! Greed – the American way!

Oct 26, 2011 8:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Buelligan wrote:
Any day now. Just wait and see. Its going to trickle down. Just keep waiting, you can wash my fleet of Bentley’s while you wait.

Oct 26, 2011 9:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.