Wisconsin animal shelters filling up due to lagging economy

Related Topics

MILWAUKEE | Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:47pm EDT

MILWAUKEE (Reuters) - Many Wisconsin animal shelters are at or near capacity, reflecting a national trend as more pet owners are forced to give away their dogs and cats because they can't afford to keep them.

"Where before it might have been due to pet allergies or the owner had a baby or some other reason, now the financial side is the predominant reason why people give up their pets," said Gayle Viney, spokeswoman for the Dane County Humane Society in Madison.

"Either they lost their home, they lost their job -- these are animals we normally wouldn't have received, because sadly, families are having to make these decisions," Viney said.

The Coulee Region Humane Society near La Crosse, Wisconsin, is always over capacity with cats, but recently has not had enough room for dogs, says executive director Heather Schmid.

Once dogs leave the shelter, more are waiting to come in, Schmid said.

"I certainly think the economy is a factor -- it has been for a couple of years," Schmid said. "We have definitely seen an increase in people surrendering their pets due to loss of a job, or downsizing from a home to an apartment."

The overflow in Wisconsin shelters is being experienced by shelters nationally due to economic hard times, said Inga Fricke, director of sheltering and pet care issues for the Humane Society of the United States.

"Most shelters struggle with greater demand for their services than they are able to provide," Fricke said.

Shelters face an increasing burden as more people surrender pets due to economic reasons such as job loss or home foreclosure, Fricke said. They also face funding pressure.

The same economic reasons cause fewer people to adopt pets, though Viney said the Madison Humane Society has been successful at promoting adoption through price breaks.

Shelters that use euthanasia have found themselves euthanizing a higher number of animals so that they can humanely care for the animals kept alive, Fricke said.

"Other organizations that do not euthanize turn animals away, or keep taking in animals and exceed capacity," Fricke said.

Fricke estimates that six to eight million animals are sheltered annually, while three to four million are euthanized.

(Writing and reporting by John Rondy; Editing by Mary Wisniewski and David Bailey)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
ladiejb wrote:
According to this report, Shelters in WI are reported to be at or near capacity and yet two of the largest HS facilities in S.E. Wisconsin as well as a number of Rescue groups in the State are regularly importing dogs, “especially puppies” from other States and from out of the Country. It would appear that the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing. Interesting that these shelters aren’t communicating with each other if they have adoptable dogs available. Or is it possible that some of these organizations are bringing in smaller and younger dogs in mass for the purposes of selling them for hundreds of dollars because those are the dogs that JQP wants. In many instances, the dogs are coming in and going out in the same weekend at advertised events. One would almost have to consider that this is turning into some kind of business.

Oct 26, 2011 6:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
@ladiejb – you took the words out of my mouth. I am very suspicious of the reason for this report. It is common knowledge that one if the shelters mentioned, plus a couple of others, with enormous financial resources already, nevertheless raising even more money on importing dogs from other states as if there were a shortage of dogs to meet the public’s insatiable desire to “rescue”. What is the truth here, it can’t be both ways, can it? Is this report setting the stage for more fund raising?

Oct 26, 2011 9:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.