Republican proposes reshaping mortgage market

WASHINGTON Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:51am EDT

United States Representative Scott Garrett, (R-NJ), speaks during a Reuters Finance Summit in Washington February 28, 2011.      REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

United States Representative Scott Garrett, (R-NJ), speaks during a Reuters Finance Summit in Washington February 28, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Roberts

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A top Republican in the House of Representatives on Thursday proposed legislation to retool the mortgage market and pave the way for a larger private sector role in the housing finance system.

The legislation, sponsored by Representative Scott Garrett, a New Jersey Republican, aims to create clear underwriting standards and establish new market rules for the buying, selling, and securitization of mortgage loans as groundwork for an eventual winding down of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

"We have not had a degree of certainty in this market place for some period of time prior to the collapse of 2008, but it is even more exacerbated by what happened after the collapse," said Garrett, who heads the House subcommittee that oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, along with the Federal Housing Administration, finance almost 90 percent of U.S. home loans.

Fannie and Freddie, government-sponsored enterprises that were seized by the government at the height of the financial crisis in September 2008 as losses on subprime mortgage debt ballooned, have received about $141 billion in taxpayer aid.

The bill would expand the mandate of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which regulates the two firms, to make it responsible for the quality of underwriting for mortgage-backed securities and for increasing pricing transparency in the secondary mortgage market.

FHFA would set standards for the issuance of all housing debt, including private-label mortgage-backed securities and not just Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's securities.

The plan envisions FHFA would be able to establish different classes of mortgages in order to create a highly liquid market that appeals to private investors.

Garrett has led a House Republican effort to chip away at the role Fannie and Freddie play in the secondary mortgage market, which has already led to the introduction of 15 separate bills.

"So long as the GSEs exist in their present configuration, the bailouts continue," Garrett said, referring to his goal to end taxpayer support to keep the two firms afloat.

The two firms, which were taken over by the government at

FHFA said on Thursday that the two firms could cost taxpayers another $121 billion to $193 billion through 2014.

Both Democrats and Republicans agree that the U.S. system of mortgage finance, the epicenter of the financial crisis, needs to be overhauled.

Republicans aim to remove most government involvement in the mortgage market, while many Democrats favor some kind of continued government support of homeownership.

(Reporting by Margaret Chadbourn; Editing by Leslie Adler)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
myemail21479 wrote:
If there is one thing this country needs, it is a financial collapse due to less government oversight in the banking and finance sector.

Oct 27, 2011 12:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
NewsDebbie wrote:
Can’t be all private as private investments are to blame for a big part of our current economic crisis. The government should play some part to protect the citizens from private business. It would need to be a partnership where the people owned a majority of the vote and power.

Oct 27, 2011 12:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
M.C.McBride wrote:
My guess is you could wind down the percent of the mortgage from the government agencies. Then increase the underwriting standards over time. I think higher and more volatile rates are inevitable from a private system.

Oct 27, 2011 3:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.