Sponsored Links

Total, Chevron profits lifted by firm oil price

A Chevron gas pump is shown at a Chevron gas station in Encinitas, California April 28, 2011.   REUTERS/Mike Blake

A Chevron gas pump is shown at a Chevron gas station in Encinitas, California April 28, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Blake

Fri Oct 28, 2011 5:39pm EDT

(Reuters) - Chevron Corp and Total posted higher profits on Friday, the latest two major oil companies lifted by pricier oil and rosier refining conditions, even if increasing oil and gas production remains a struggle.

The third-quarter earnings from Total and Chevron capped a week that saw big profit gains at Exxon Mobil Corp, Royal Dutch Shell Plc and BP Plc as benchmark Brent oil prices hover near $110 per barrel, nearly 50 percent higher than the year-earlier quarter.

Still, oil prices were slightly down from the second quarter, which helped refineries at these integrated oil companies (IOCs) post higher margins and profits.

"The IOCs have not typically been getting much credit for better than expected downstream results," energy-focused investment bank Simmons & Co wrote in a note to investors.

Chevron, the second-largest U.S. oil company behind Exxon, said its profits more than doubled, helped by a gain of about $500 million from the sale of its Pembroke refinery to Valero Energy Corp.

Chevron also bumped up its dividend for a second time this year, reflecting a strong cash position.

Citigroup said big capital expenditure commitments were weighing on its European competitors' cash flows, but expected free cash flow to grow for some of them next year.

For its part, Chevron said on Friday that its 2012 capital and exploratory (C&E) budget would show a "noticeable increase" from the $26 billion it expects for this year.

"We have indicated previously that our medium-term C&E requirements would be robust, a direct result of having such a healthy and, frankly, enviable development queue," Chief Financial Officer Pat Yarrington said on a conference call.

OUTPUT DOWN

Total's third-quarter profit rose 24 percent, meeting market expectations, as its output fell by 1 percent because of disruptions in Libya.

Chevron saw a drop in output to 2.6 million barrels of oil equivalent per day (bpd) from 2.74 million a year before. Based on its outlook, Yarrington said it was fair to expect 2011 production "light" of Chevron's 2.73 million bpd forecast.

Chevron had already said in July that a slower Gulf of Mexico project ramp-up and a Thai pipeline problem would trim its 2011 production by about 30,000 bpd.

Occidental Petroleum Corp, the fourth-largest U.S. oil company, represents an alternative bet for oil investors as it has no refining like the IOCs, but it has aggressively pushed for production growth that Barclays Capital said on Friday had led to negative cash flow in the past six quarters.

Yet shares of Occidental rose another 2 percent on Friday, following a 10 percent jump a day earlier in response to its stronger-than-expected results.

Chevron and Total, like their IOC peers, have struggled to increase oil production in recent years.

Disappointment about this has weighed on oil stocks, and Total in particular has been punished by investors -- until a rally that has lifted its stock 27 percent since September 26, when it raised its 2010-15 average output goal to 3 percent per year from 2 percent.

Chevron is sticking with long-term production growth targets of 1 percent through 2014, and then 4 percent to 5 percent in the three years after that, driven by Gulf of Mexico and Australian output.

Assuming oil prices of $100 a barrel, oil companies offered attractive long-run value, said analyst Kurt Wulff at McDep Associates. "But investors would like to see a little growth, and that's hard to come by with the very big companies."

Total has made over $10 billion of acquisitions in the past 18 months, expanding its geographical footprint beyond its historical heartland of Africa to Australia, Canada and Russia.

Shares in Total fell about 2 percent in Friday trading, while Chevron shares climbed 0.6 percent to $109.64 -- within sight of its record high of $110 touched on Thursday.

(Reporting by Marie Maitre in Paris, Braden Reddall in San Francisco and Matt Daily in New York, editing by Dave Zimmerman, Gerald E. McCormick and Tim Dobbyn)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
sorestloser wrote:
When the economy is in slowdown mode and the price of oil goes up, and demand goes down 4% at least as the oil companies have reported, there is something very wrong.

A better term might be medieval. In around the 600 bc time frame, barons would drag chains across the Rhine to prevent barques from passing before exacting a toll. Then they built castles above their works. The only solution was for Germany to consolidate as a country and end the little city states causing trade problems. At a minimum, the oil hoarders should be considered monopolistic and free trade averse and treated like any other company that tries to form a monopoly.

Oct 28, 2011 12:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
chris876541 wrote:
Big deal…. and many businesses have continuing reduced profits as oil/gasoline price manipulation pulls discretionary funds from other sectors. Would be different if oil profits were circulated in the economy, but they’re not – is like Exxon et al stuffing money under a mattress.

Oct 28, 2011 1:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
marusik wrote:
Unfortunately commodities like oil have fallen in the sinister hands of voracious speculators who recklessly manipulate the markets for their own profit, while oil companies keep pouring millions on unscrupulous lobbyists to ensure that regulations will only cater their corporate interest.
It’s time for the American government to act on the best interest of the American people no of multinational corporations…

Oct 28, 2011 2:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.