Deadly melons renew food safety focus; will money follow?

Sun Oct 30, 2011 11:08am EDT

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Debbie Frederick hopes that her father's death in September in one of the most lethal outbreaks of food-borne illness in U.S. history will force the government to increase the safety of the country's food supply.

It took more than a decade, a series of deadly outbreaks tied to food like peanuts, spinach and ground beef, as well as a coalition of strange bedfellows -- victims, public health advocates and food industry representatives -- to push through the first major revamp of food safety laws since the 1930s.

But advocates and other experts say the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) signed by President Barack Obama in January still has shortcomings and worry it will be watered down through a lack of funding.

The United States by most measures has some of the safest food in the world. Still, roughly one in six people get sick from eating tainted products each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

"The whole system was built to react to people getting sick" or to discoveries of contaminated food, said Erik Olson, the Pew Health Group's director of food programs.

The Food and Drug Administration, which regulates about 80 percent of the U.S. food supply, including melons and other produce, requires major structural changes to become primarily focused on prevention, as FSMA envisions. While lawmakers recently have given FDA more money for food programs, it still has lots of catching up to do, Olson said.

Eighty-seven-year-old William Beach, Frederick's father, lived in Oklahoma and was one of the 28 people killed by listeria infection after eating cantaloupe contaminated in what regulators called an "unsanitary" Jensen Farms packing plant in Colorado.

"My father was terrified ... nobody should have to go like that," said Frederick, a Phoenix aesthetician and newly minted activist who is the driving force behind her family's lawsuit against Jensen Farms. "The system broke down. It shouldn't have happened. This is a preventable thing."

Herb Stevens, of suburban Denver, also became ill after eating tainted cantaloupe, but he survived. The World War Two veteran, 84, lived at home with his wife before falling ill and now requires full-time care.

"We'd like to see better food safety laws and more inspectors," Jeni Exley, Stevens' daughter, said in an interview. Her family is suing for current and future medical expenses.

WHERE'S THE TEETH?

FSMA aims to be a step in that direction.

The law requires FDA to set standards for produce safety and mandates more frequent inspections of domestic and foreign food processing facilities. It also gives FDA stronger enforcement tools, such as mandatory recall authority and the ability to yank the registration of a processing plant.

While inspectors from the U.S. Department of Agriculture must be present at meat and poultry plants they regulate during operating hours, FDA had no frequency mandate for inspections prior to FSMA. As a result, lapses of as long as 10 years were not uncommon.

All high-risk domestic facilities, or those that handle foods with a high potential to cause harm, must be inspected within five years of enactment and no less than every three years thereafter, according to the FDA. In addition, the law rapidly steps up the number of required inspections for foreign facilities.

Jeff Almer and Randy Napier, who lost their mothers to the salmonella outbreak blamed for killing nine people and sickening 700 others who ate contaminated products from Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) in 2008 and 2009, fought to get FSMA passed and now are pushing more FDA funding.

"The needs are substantially greater than what is covered by current funding," said Steven Grossman, deputy executive director of the Alliance for a Stronger FDA, which said FDA's food funding rose $52 million to $836 million in fiscal 2011.

The U.S. House of Representatives wants to cut that funding to $750 million in fiscal 2012, while the Senate is proposing increasing funding to $867 million. It is still not known where the final number will come out.

The issue is personal for Almer and Napier, who frequently work with reporters and button-hole lawmakers.

PCA, now bankrupt, is accused of knowingly shipping contaminated products in violation of federal law. The men want to see company President Stewart Parnell criminally charged.

Handing down an indictment of Parnell would "send a loud and clear message to producers of food to literally clean up their acts," Almer said.

"We believe there is absolutely no basis for criminal prosecution," said Parnell's attorney Bill Gust, a partner at - Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore.

Napier said he has made at least six trips to Washington, D.C., since his mother's death. Almer testified before Congress in 2009 and said he met with federal law enforcement representatives regarding the PCA criminal case.

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
ramon123 wrote:
Every time someone gets sick it’s the same old crap – spend more money and achieve nothing but more debt. Most of the 254,678 federal regulations are nothing more than ink on paper – there’s no way they can
all be enforced. Federal regulations are a joke – enacted by brainless politicians unqualified to regulate anything and left on the books for decades, accomplishing nothing. The way laws and regulations are enacted is something to make fun of, not depend upon.

Oct 30, 2011 12:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Gabacho wrote:
The onslot of new regulations that are being thrown at the growers of our food will have little effect on food safety, but the cost of growing food is skyrocketing. Look folks, we grow food mostly out doors. You tell me what government regulation is going to stop a flock of Sea Gulls or Wild Geese from crapping on my lettuce as they fly over head? The dirty little secret is that we are being forced to cut down all the trees, to remove the habitat for birds and kill all the gophers, rats, rabbits, quail, skunks, coyotes, and chase off the owls that live around produce fields. And in the end, if you don’t wash your produce, it’s not going to be a damn bit safer than it was before. This food safety phobia is responsible for wiping out a a vast number of animals and their habatat and driving the cost of food way up with no real improvement in food safety. Think before you vote.

Oct 30, 2011 7:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.