Nonpartisan group offers US political alternative

WASHINGTON Wed Nov 2, 2011 6:06pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A nonpartisan group said on Wednesday it has gathered millions of signatures, and millions of dollars, from voters so unhappy with the toxic U.S. political climate that they want a centrist independent to run for president in 2012.

The group, Americans Elect, is creating an Internet-based third party in which registered voters will choose someone to run against the Republican nominee and Barack Obama when the Democratic president vies for re-election next year.

So far, Americans Elect has gathered more than 1.9 million signatures in support of its petition to get on the ballot in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., and raised almost $22 million.

"There is a huge receptivity across the board to an independent candidate," Douglas Schoen, Americans Elect's chief strategist, a former adviser to politicians including President Bill Clinton and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, told a news conference.

With polls showing that 80 percent of Americans are unhappy with how the country is being governed, there has been a growing support for an alternative to politicians from the two major parties who seem unable to work together.

STARBUCKS CHIEF FOR PRESIDENT?

Backers of the idea have expressed support for everyone from Bloomberg, a former Republican who is now an independent, to Howard Schultz, the chief executive of coffee firm Starbucks, as possible third-party candidates.

Americans Elect was founded by the wealthy investor Peter Ackerman. It officers include political veterans from both parties who say they are tired of the current poisonous divide between U.S. Democrats and Republicans.

Americans Elect insists its goal is not to defeat any particular candidate. But, citing Herman Cain's low-budget campaign and strong showing in the Republican primary field, they say they believe their candidate could win a significant share of the 2012 vote.

That could be bad news for Obama. The only two incumbent presidents who have failed to be re-elected in the past 32 years were Democrat Jimmy Carter and Republican George H.W. Bush, both when third-party candidates won significant votes.

Americans Elect is using the Internet to run a "virtual" direct primary, in which any American who is registered to vote can help select its presidential candidate.

Americans Elect has qualified to have its candidate on the ballot in seven states and is awaiting word on its petitions to do so in four others, while collecting signatures in 13 more. The rest will come in 2012.

The group has set itself up as a non-profit, which does not have to release the names of its donors. Campaign finance activists say the group is violating the tax code and have filed a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service.

"A political party is not entitled to be treated as a 'social welfare' organization under federal tax laws and is required to disclose its donors. Period," said Fred Wertheimer, president of the campaign finance watchdog Democracy 21.

Americans Elect's leaders say they are merely offering voters an alternative to the current two-party system, not backing a particular political agenda.

(Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
dingodoggie wrote:
Nice idea, but how would an “Americans Elect” president rule, with Capitol Hill fully under control by the Republican/Democrat parties? As the article says, it could just break Obama’s neck and help whoever is nominated on the Republican side into power. Maybe that is the plan?

To break the two party lock on the U.S., I believe it is necessary to start bottom up, ie by working to introduce a representative system in as many states as possible. As long as it is sufficient to buy off two parties the U.S. political system will remain dysfunctional and corrupt. Only if there are other alternative parties with a chance of representation, the voters will be able to punish corruption and lobbyism in a meaningful way – currently it is sufficient for each of the two to appear momentarily less corrupt than the other party to get elected.

Nov 02, 2011 5:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
TexanForever wrote:
Why doesn’t this group or any other support the so-called 26th Amendment that has been widely circulated on the Internet? Get it on the ballot in all 50 states and our problems are solved. Trying to elect a Third Party President is a waste of time and votes.

Nov 02, 2011 6:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
hereiam2005 wrote:
I found the way it is trying to avoid disclosing its donors’ name particularly troubling. After all, if it is not another swiftboating style attack, why try to dodge the disclosing? It is remains to be seen, but without financial transparency, what will this be any difference from the current two party system?

Nov 02, 2011 6:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.