Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Maxim Hot 100

The world's most beautiful women as chosen by Maxim readers.  Slideshow 

Shreen Mohammad sits with other recruits during a military exercise at the Kabul Military Training Center (KMTC) in Kabul March 28, 2012. A landmark NATO summit in Chicago endorsed an exit strategy that calls for handing control of Afghanistan to its own security forces by the middle of next year but left questions unanswered about how to prevent a slide into chaos and a Taliban resurgence after allied troops are gone. Picture taken March 28, 2012.   REUTERS/Omar Sobhani (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: POLITICS MILITARY SOCIETY) ATTENTION EDITORS: PICTURE 18 OF 27 FOR PACKAGE 'AFGHAN ARMY RECRUIT'

Afghan army recruit

A look at an Afghan recruit as he goes through the process of joining the Afghan National Army.  Slideshow 

Democrats revive financial transaction tax idea

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Wed Nov 2, 2011 3:51pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A new tax on financial transactions would be imposed under legislation unveiled on Wednesday by two Democratic congressmen, refocusing attention on an idea that has so far gained little traction.

With the G20 expected to resume its transaction tax debate this week, Representative Peter DeFazio and Senator Tom Harkin proposed a 0.03 percent tax on stock, bond and derivative trades. It would take effect, if adopted, in 2013.

Similar bills in recent years have made no progress in Congress, undermining support for a tax at the global level, despite debt-burdened governments' need for new revenues and widespread concern about financial market volatility.

DeFazio said at a news conference the tax is low enough that it would have little impact on traditional financial trading, and hit hardest high-frequency trading, which he called a blight on the economy. These rapid traders "don't make things, they don't feed people -- they churn," DeFazio said.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will be in France this week for a meeting of the Group of 20, a coalition of the world's richest industrialized economies. French President Nicolas Sarkozy has been a strong supporter of the tax.

"We're hoping that (President Barack Obama) will provide direction to Secretary Geithner to not go to (the G20 meeting) with a closed mind," DeFazio said.

The United States should consider the financial transaction tax "as a potential way for both the EU and the U.S. to squeeze some volatility out of the market," he said.

The Harkin-DeFazio proposal has not yet been scored by Congress' nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation for how much tax revenue it could generate. Harkin estimated it could bring in "a couple hundred billion."

He said he hopes Congress' so-called super committee on deficit reduction will consider the transaction tax. "This certainly ought to be part of the revenue mix," Harkin said.

EU-WIDE TAX PROPOSED

The European Commission in September proposed an EU-wide transaction tax. Banks at the time described the plan as nonsense. Britain said it would only back a global levy.

In addition to the United States, countries opposing the proposed tax include China, Britain, Australia, Canada and India, according to sources within the Group of 20, a coalition of the world's richest, industrialized economies.

Under the commission's plan, stock and bond trades would be taxed at a 0.1 percent rate, with derivatives at 0.01 percent.

The G20 has tried and failed in the past year to agree on a global transaction tax, sometimes called a Tobin Tax after the U.S. economist who devised it in the 1970s.

Reacting to Harkin-DeFazio, lobbying groups for financial firms renewed their opposition for the tax.

"A financial transaction tax is essentially a sales tax on investors," said Ken Bentsen, executive vice president of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.

It would "impede the efficiency of markets and impair depth and liquidity, as well as raise costs to the issuers, pensions and investors who help drive economic growth," he said.

(Reporting by Patrick Temple-West, editing by Matthew Lewis)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
TommyAD wrote:
The FTT has destroyed jobs and been a net loss to the national treasury everywhere it’s been tried. Sweden’s FTT was repealed because it collected only 3% of the projected revenues and resulted in severe job losses after over 50% of their investment/trading industry left the country to avoid the tax. Today Sweden is one of the FTT’s strongest opponents. The “Impact Assessment Report” for the proposed European Union FTT showed that it would reduce EU GDP by 0.5%, cost over 500,000 lost jobs, and reduce net tax revenues by 1.8% (i.e., the taxes collected from the FTT would be less than the income and capital gains taxes lost from the contraction of GDP and resulting job losses).

Introducing the FTT into our economic system would cause thousands of American finance industry jobs to be “offshored” to Switzerland, Hong Kong, Canada, Australia, Singapore, Russia and other countries that have firmly rejected the FTT as destructive economic policy. Schwabish (2005) estimated in his study that the introduction of an FTT in the US “would cause the loss of 150,000-210,000 private-sector jobs in New York alone.”

Supporters of the FTT often tout the success of the UK “stamp tax,” but fail to disclose that most banks and investment firms do not pay the tax. Over 70% of all London Exchange transactions pay no stamp tax, and 100% of all other transactions (e.g., trades on the CME or NYSE) are also exempt. Of all the transactions that originate in the UK, fewer than 3% are subject to the stamp tax. So few transactions are affected as to make it irrelevant. The UK stands firmly against the EU FTT because they know it would decimate London’s economy as investment firms relocate to Switzerland, Hong Kong and other non-FTT jurisdictions.

Nov 02, 2011 8:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
anonomouser wrote:
The democrats are idiots when it comes to economic legislation. Witness the Durbin amendment to the “Consumer Protection Act” that does absolutely nothing for consumers, but may well turn into a windfall for banks because it gives them an excuse to charge higher fees now.

Saying that high frequency traders cause the wild market fluctuations is just a bunch of FUD. High frequency traders provide market liquidity that is actually quite useful. A FTT will simply drive the high frequency traders out of the market, not generate revenue.

Many Americans now have much of their retirement in mutual funds, stocks, and bonds. These folks will be hit the hard by a FFT because they have few alternatives.

Nov 03, 2011 1:29am EDT  --  Report as abuse
egbegb wrote:
How would a transaction tax effect index funds found in almost all retirement accounts?
Don’t they rebalance their funds daily? Wouldn’t an index fund after 220 days (1 year) of trading

(.5%/day x 200days = 100%)

be completely consumed by the Government tax?
What am I missing?

Nov 08, 2011 3:01pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.