Iran boosts anti-U.S. rhetoric ahead of nuclear report

Related Topics

Iranian women stand in front of an anti-U.S. mural painted on the wall of the former U.S. Embassy in Tehran, November 4, 2011. REUTERS/Raheb Homavandi

Iranian women stand in front of an anti-U.S. mural painted on the wall of the former U.S. Embassy in Tehran, November 4, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Raheb Homavandi

TEHRAN | Fri Nov 4, 2011 10:42am EDT

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran marked the anniversary of the 1979 seizure of the U.S. embassy on Friday with burning flags and chants of "Death to America," escalating its anti-U.S. rhetoric ahead of the release of a pivotal U.N. report on its nuclear program.

Thousands of students burned the Stars and Stripes, an effigy of Uncle Sam and pictures of President Barack Obama outside the leafy downtown Tehran compound that once housed the U.S. mission.

The embassy was stormed by hardline students on November 4 1979, shortly after Iran's Islamic revolution toppled the U.S.-backed shah, and 52 Americans were held hostage there for 444 days. The two countries have been enemies ever since.

Tehran has raised the volume of its anti-American rhetoric since October when the United States accused Iran of plotting to assassinate Saudi Arabia's ambassador to Washington. Iran calls the accusations false.

Tension between Iran and the West is particularly high ahead of the publication next week of a report by the United Nations nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, expected to suggest Iran is seeking nuclear weapons.

Iran says its nuclear program is aimed at peaceful generation of electricity, but its failure to allay suspicions that it is seeking a bomb has prompted the United Nations to impose four rounds of economic sanctions on Tehran.

For its part, Tehran accuses the United States and Israel of killing several Iranian nuclear scientists in recent years.

"America has carried out terrorist acts against Iran and other countries ... We will support those who are against America's policies outside and inside America," the secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Saeed Jalili, told the crowd outside the former embassy.

He said Iran would present the United Nations with evidence of U.S. plots against Iran, and the foreign ministry would summon the Swiss ambassador on Friday to protest. The Swiss embassy represents U.S. interests in Iran.

Iran's top authority Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday he had 100 "undeniable documents" proving the U.S. was behind "terrorist acts" in Iran.

PRESSURE

The United States, Britain and France have turned up the pressure on Iran this week ahead of next week's IEAE report, expected to unveil detailed intelligence pointing to military dimensions of Iran's nuclear program.

"One (issue) in particular that I want to mention is the continuing threat posed by Iran's nuclear program," U.S. President Barack Obama told reporters after meeting French President Nicolas Sarkozy in the resort of Cannes.

"The IAEA is scheduled to release a report on Iran's nuclear program next week and President Sarkozy and I agree on the need to maintain the unprecedented pressure on Iran to meet its obligations."

The United States and Israel have refused to rule out military strikes against Iranian nuclear sites. Iran has warned of a fierce response to any attack.

"Nuclear technology is our absolute right," read one banner carried by students at Friday's protest.

"We came here to show America that it cannot do a damn thing and we will destroy them if they attack Iran," said Mehdi Asadi, 13, who said he was attending the ceremony to pay homage to the takeover of the embassy.

(Writing by; Parisa Hafezi)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
thebruce wrote:
if they had documents capable of proving to the whole world the united states had committed crimes on their soil, WHY WAIT UNTIL YOU ARE ECONOMICALLY ISOLATED AND BACKED INTO A CORNER BY THE IAEA???

Nov 04, 2011 12:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
W-DS wrote:
No point in them proving what everyone already knows/assumes anyway;

The fact we pushed for the group openly waging terrorism in Iran to be taken off the terror group list, and rallied Europe to join us, shows just how much we really deplore terrorism.

Are we hypocrites? or are we just insulting the memory of the victims of 9/11? By ignoring similar attacks on other innocents, whilst condemning attacks on our innocents by the same type of people; terrorists.

Nov 04, 2011 12:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
sothatsit wrote:
Its sad to see a quote of a 13 year old boy screaming for war. The fact that the war Iran had with Iraq that lingered on for decades with no results should give Iran and its people pause considering we effectively routed there mortal enemy in around 6 months. They cant not have noticed it, there right next door. Do they really believe they can do any better than the Iraqi’s did? Do they think there recent foray into a technology we invented 70 years ago will somehow give them some kind of edge in a war with us and our Allies? Not to mention, Mr Einstein that went to Israel way back when this technology was in its infancy? While it is apparent Iran has made some advances technologically, it appears there technological advancements are not being used for the improvement of the quality of life for its people, but rather for purposes of war. A war that will have no winners, but plenty of dead people on both sides. Iran more than likely will attempt to escalate any war to a conclusion of totality by use of chemical or nuclear material. What they fail to acknowledge is that the world has not seen chemical weapons used on the battlefield since ww 1, to the horror of both sides of the war. The outcome of their use was a treaty that the world signed on to promising to never again use chemical weapons on the battlefield due to the indiscriminate nature of the weapons. All country’s ended up not only with many dead, but many permanently blinded and or disfigured people. A tremendous cost for many decades even after the war was over.

Nov 04, 2011 1:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.