Canada's PM says oil pipeline still has U.S. support

U.S. President Barack Obama (L) and Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper talk during a meeting on the second day of the G20 Summit in Cannes November 4, 2011.  REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. President Barack Obama (L) and Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper talk during a meeting on the second day of the G20 Summit in Cannes November 4, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

CANNES, France | Fri Nov 4, 2011 4:08pm EDT

CANNES, France (Reuters) - Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said on Friday he sees overwhelming U.S. support for TransCanada Corp's Keystone XL oil pipeline to Texas from Canada's oil sands, despite recent signs of reticence in Washington.

Harper, who was in France for the G20 summit, said he did not interpret U.S. President Barack Obama's remarks this week as pointing to a rejection of the $7 billion pipeline proposal, which is opposed by environmental groups.

"I read the President's comments. I thought on balance they were noncommittal and he indicated he had yet to make a decision and we respect that," Harper said.

Obama told a Nebraska television station that he would make the final call on approving the pipeline based on economic and health criteria. Previously, it was believed that the responsibility for making the decision had rested with the State Department. Meanwhile, the State Department said its own process could slip past its year-end deadline.

"(The pipeline) has, notwithstanding opposition in some circles, if you look at the range of business and labor and state interests, overwhelming support," Harper said. "It's a project that not only will create a vast number of jobs in both our countries but is essential to American energy security."

Harper and his government have lobbied intensely in support of the project, which would connect refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast with Alberta's oil sands.

Canada's oil industry says the pipeline will bolster U.S. energy security by providing a stable source of oil from a friendly neighbor. Environmental groups, some U.S. politicians and numerous celebrities, say the project will delay the shift to a green economy and increase the risk of oil spills in environmentally sensitive areas such as the Ogallala aquifer in the central states.

(Reporting by David Ljunggren, writing by Jeffrey Jones; editing by Peter Galloway)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Fufi wrote:
Mr. Obama and Mr. Harper: Please ensure the most minimum impact to the environment and GO FOR IT.Forget about the opposing negative idiots.

Nov 04, 2011 5:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
LuneKeltkar wrote:
Fufi,

You do know that the Keystone pipeline already exists, that Canadian oil-sands oil is already being shipped to refineries in the US midwest, and that this proposed pipeline only serves the short-term profits of the involved oil companies, right?

Lune

Nov 04, 2011 5:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
hillarybgawn wrote:
Actually, Mr. Harper, the pipeline has the support of monied Texans who, while representing influential tribal elements of Baja Canada, are not representative of the U.S. province as a whole. Neither are these tribal elements considered especially “overwhelming” down here in the hinterlands.

Nov 06, 2011 8:52am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.