Wealth and Investing Center

Wall Street needs women, younger clients to compete: Krawcheck

Related Topics

A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange August 19, 2011.  REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange August 19, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

NEW YORK | Mon Nov 7, 2011 12:18pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Wall Street must raise its appeal to the next generation of investors and female professionals to remain competitive in the wealth management industry, the former head of Bank of America's wealth management unit said on Monday.

The securities industry "doesn't do a great job for women or being appropriate" for the next generation, said Sallie Krawcheck, who was ousted as head of Bank of America's global wealth and investment management unit in September.

"We talk about stock market returns. We're not talking as an industry about protecting the downside," said Krawcheck, speaking at the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association annual meeting in New York.

More conversations need to focus on planning and asset allocation, she said.

Indeed, becoming more relevant to a younger generation of prospective clients and building more diverse teams of advisers are among the changes Wall Street will have to make to compete in the future, Krawcheck said during an interview at the conference with PBS host Charlie Rose.

Younger prospective clients have become skeptical of the industry through press images of advisers being untrustworthy and repeated messages to avoid the markets, she said.

"They typically think that these organizations don't add value," she said.

The average wealth management client is about 63 years old, said Krawcheck, higher than the mid-50s average age of clients when Krawcheck started in the field during the 1990s.

Still, strategies for attracting the next generation of investors are fairly straightforward.

"The number one thing is 'Return my phone call,'" said Krawcheck. Other tools the industry can provide to clients, such as liquidity management, rank lower in priority.

"Clients typically say investment performance is important, but it's usually about 8th on the list," she said.

Often described as one of the most powerful women on Wall Street, Krawcheck said the dearth of female advisers posed one of the biggest challenges for the wealth management industry.

Women make up 16 to 17 percent of advisers in the industry today, she said. In senior management positions, that number is smaller - about 15 percent.

"Our industry does not do a great job for women," she said at the conference. "We do have large groups of people - women - who are underserved by our business."

Krawcheck said she visited the Harvard Business School last week, where she spoke to a group of young women interested in pursuing careers in the field, and felt apologetic about how the advancement of women advisers had been slow over the past decades.

"I kept wanting to say, 'I'm sorry - I feel sort of sad that, when I was your age I really wouldn't have thought that 25 years on, that we wouldn't have made more progress than we've made'," she said.

Indeed, the diversification of people working in the wealth management industry is key to tackling the challenges of a complex economy, Krawcheck said.

"You need a broad range of perspectives in order to navigate through."

(Reporting by Suzanne Barlyn and Ashley Lau; Editing by Bernadette Baum)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Bob9999 wrote:
Thus, one is led to the question, “What is Wall Street?” The standard, and probably correct, answer is that it is a market that allows businesses to raise capital. The new generation of investors mentioned in the article would be the buyers in such a market. The question they will ask, however, is not about the demographic composition of participants in “Wall Street” transactions. The question they will ask is whether “Wall Street” offers them the best possible return on their investment. This question raises both questions of “Wall Street” performance (the Dow still has not returned to the highest level it had reached before the Tech Slide in 2000), questions about whether ordinary “Wall Street” transactions are fair to the individual mom-and-pop investors who fund the $50 million annual bonuses of even mediocre “Wall Street” denizens, and to the risk of being taken advantage of by the true scoundrels. Indeed, a young person might be better advised to invest in building a small business than to invest in “Wall Street” financial instruments. Furthermore, there is also the public policy question of whether the separation of ownership and control that typifies “Wall Street” is in the public interest. If large banks and other financial institutions had been organized as general partnerships, with even mid-level executives being personally liable for the debts of the business, then we would not have seen the kind of insane risk that led to either the financial crisis of 2008 or the European debt crisis of 2011. If reaching out to women and younger clients means bringing in potential investors who were not previously “Wall Street” customers, then my question would be, “Why should they trust ‘Wall Street’ with their money?” Again, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is still below the highest level it attained before the Tech Slide of 2000. That means that stocks have lost money over the last 11-12 years, irrespective of the financial crisis of 2008.

My guess is that the really smart money is thinking about selling “Wall Street” short. The institutional structure is based on the open outcry financial markets of the 19th and 20th century, which had become obsolete no later than 1987. “Wall Street” is, in reality, a bunch of middle men mediating between computer programs. And one thing we know about the development of business institutions over the last 30 years is that middle men — who function largely as gatekeepers who process information — have been made obsolete by information technology.

A pox on all of your houses.

Nov 07, 2011 1:07pm EST  --  Report as abuse
AvgJoeMoney wrote:
I totally agree with Krawcheck. Moves by Wall Street firms like Merrill Lynch to get rid of the little accounts is also a move to boot their future big accounts. That 20 year old kid who you don’t want is going to become the huge account you’d love in 20 years, but she’ll remember your firm and avoid it at all costs. Too much attention to quarterly earnings and not enough to the long view.

Nov 07, 2011 1:40pm EST  --  Report as abuse
KyuuAL wrote:
They need women?! No wonder Wall Street is full of heartless, corrupt men. They’re not even getting any women.

Nov 07, 2011 2:26pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.