Iran worked on nuclear bomb design: U.N. watchdog

VIENNA Tue Nov 8, 2011 5:01pm EST

A general view of the Bushehr nuclear power plant, some 1,200 km (746 miles) south of Tehran October 26, 2010. REUTERS/IRNA/Mohammad Babaie

A general view of the Bushehr nuclear power plant, some 1,200 km (746 miles) south of Tehran October 26, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/IRNA/Mohammad Babaie

Related Topics

VIENNA (Reuters) - Iran appears to have worked on designing an atomic bomb and may still be conducting secret research, the U.N. nuclear watchdog said in a report likely to raise tensions in the Middle East.

Citing what it called "credible" information from member states and elsewhere, the agency listed a series of activities applicable to developing nuclear weapons, such as high explosives testing and development of an atomic bomb trigger.

The report immediately exposed splits among the big powers about how best to handle the row over Iran's nuclear aims: the United States signaled tougher sanctions on Tehran but Russia said the report could hurt chances for diplomacy.

It was preceded by Israeli media speculation that the Jewish state may strike against its arch foe's nuclear sites. But Defense Minister Ehud Barak said on Tuesday no decision had been made on embarking on a military operation.

Iran, which denies it wants nuclear weapons, condemned the findings of the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as "unbalanced" and "politically motivated."

IAEA chief Yukiya Amano is "playing a very dangerous game," Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Iran's ambassador to the agency, told Reuters Television.

Tehran's history of hiding sensitive nuclear activity from the IAEA, continued restrictions on IAEA access and its refusal to suspend enrichment, which can yield fuel for atom bombs, have drawn four rounds of U.N. sanctions and separate punitive steps by the United States and European Union.

The report detailed evidence apparently showing concerted, covert efforts to acquire the capability to make atomic bombs.

Some of the cited research and development work by Iran have both civilian and military applications, but "others are specific to nuclear weapons," said the report, obtained by Reuters on Tuesday ahead of an IAEA board of governors meeting.

Oil prices briefly rose after it was issued, with Brent crude trading up 11 cents to $114.67 a barrel at 1:33 p.m. EDT.

"I think the facts lay out a pretty overwhelming case that this was a pretty sophisticated nuclear weapons effort aimed at miniaturizing a warhead for a ballistic missile," said prominent U.S. proliferation expert David Albright.

"It's overwhelming in the amount of details, it is a pretty convincing case," he told Reuters.

Western powers have pressured the major oil producer, which says its nuclear program is aimed at increasing electricity generation, over its record of hiding sensitive nuclear activity and lack of full cooperation with U.N. inspectors.

The United States will look to put more pressure on Iran if it fails to answer questions raised by the IAEA report, a senior U.S. official said in Washington.

"That could include additional sanctions by the United States. It could also include steps that we take together with other nations," the official told reporters.

Russia criticized the report, saying it would dim hopes for dialogue with Tehran on its nuclear ambitions and suggesting it was meant to scuttle chances for a diplomatic solution.

"We have serious doubts about the justification for steps to reveal contents of the report to a broad public, primarily because it is precisely now that certain chances for the renewal of dialogue between the 'sextet' of international mediators and Tehran have begun to appear," the Russian Foreign Ministry said.

Russia and the United States are among the six big powers -- also including China, Britain, France and Germany -- which have been involved in stalled attempts to find a diplomatic solution to the nuclear dispute with Iran.

Tehran has for years dismissed allegations of atomic bomb research, based largely on Western intelligence funneled to the IAEA, as fabricated and baseless, and more recently sought to discredit Amano as a tool of Washington.

The IAEA said it had carefully assessed intelligence passed on from member states and found it consistent in terms of technical content, individuals and organizations cited and time frames. It said it had gathered its own supportive details.

"The Agency is concerned because some of the activities undertaken after 2003 would be highly relevant to a nuclear weapon program," it said.


The IAEA "has serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program," the U.N body said in the report, which included an unusual 13-page annex with technical descriptions of research with explosives and computer simulations applicable to nuclear detonations.

It added: "The information also indicates that prior to the end of 2003, these activities took place under a structured program, and that some activities may still be ongoing."

U.S. spy services estimated in 2007 that Iran had halted outright "weaponisation" research four years previously, but also that the Islamic Republic was continuing efforts to master technology usable in nuclear explosives.

The IAEA report included information from both before and after 2003. It voiced "particular concern" about information given by two member states that Iran had carried out computer modeling studies relevant to nuclear weapons in 2008-09.

"The application of such studies to anything other than a nuclear explosive is unclear to the agency," the IAEA said.

The information also indicated that Iran had built a large explosives vessel at the Parchin military complex southeast of Tehran in which to conduct hydrodynamic experiments, which are "strong indicators of possible weapon development."

Israeli officials had no immediate comment on the IAEA report, which was big news in a Jewish state that feels uniquely threatened by Iran. Israel is widely believed to harbor the Middle East's only nuclear arsenal.

For several years the IAEA has been investigating Western intelligence reports indicating that Iran has coordinated efforts to process uranium, test high explosives and revamp a ballistic missile cone to accommodate a nuclear warhead.

Iran, the world's No. 5 oil exporter, insists that its work to enrich uranium is for a future network of nuclear power plants to provide electricity for a rapidly growing population.

(Additional reporting by Dan Williams in Jerusalem, Arshad Mohammed in Washington, Steve Gutterman in Moscow and Zahra Hosseinian and Parisa Hafezi in Tehran; Editing by Robert Woodward)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (25)
brian-decree wrote:
I hear they tried to procure yellow cake Uranium…… from Niger!

and I’ve heard they have a lot of metal tubes, or centerfuges that can be used to refine Uranium!

and they have also got mobile production facilities set up in Semi-trailers!

Weapons of mass destruction!!!!

Without revealing your sources for this “”"”"evidence”"”"” (that you wont show us) reuters, there is NO proof.

And we’d be crazy to trust you this time around…

Nov 08, 2011 3:25pm EST  --  Report as abuse
cmac2573 wrote:
How much more evidence do you need. Are we going to wait until they have the capability and are ready to use it. Sooner or later somebody will have to act before they end up dropping the bomb on one of our allies and sending us into a nuclear war.

Nov 08, 2011 4:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
It appears from the new account that the IAEA received a great deal of information from “member states” – meaning the US in great probability. It is doubtful that Russia or China would offer intelligence to the IAEA as they are evidently OK with a nuclear IRAN. Few others are capable of satellite Intel.

How accurate is this information? As honest as the government member state is in providing it. Perhaps it is accurate in its entirety – perhaps it is created content for a purpose. These days it is becoming harder and harder to detect a fake from the real thing in any recording, photograph, or audio sampling when created professionally and vetted through lower unknowing analysts who are specialists in their field to catch these type issues. But that type talk only goes to create conspiracy theories though with a fair probability of fact.

However, the majority odds are that the theocracy is as it has always been which is a lying and deceiving government setup as the ultra dictatorship in the form of a theocratic government – that dictates their will in the name of ‘god’. (Reminiscent of the dark ages with the Ayatollah1 as the Pope and the Islamic clergy as the Catholic Church. And the oppression on their own followers and the innocent ruthlessness also appears to follow the analogy.)

The report gives the impression that IRAN is following North Korea’s lead. Continue to lie and continue to develop the bomb. From a straight forward reading of the Koran, this is not only permissible but encouraged as to how to treat your enemies.

So what is the hope and change leader going to do? It is doubtful that war is immanent prior to an election – unless he is losing – then being a strong commander and chief will increase his voting base for the Iranians will certainly way over react and the dogs of war will be unleashed. I trust both leaders of each county equally in telling the truth to the public.

The real issue is what will the Iranians do with a weapon that is both an attack of mass destruction and guaranteed self destruction? Is it worth their country to destroy Israel? For Russia and China it was not. But they were not a theocracy. The Pope sent children to die in the crusades. The Iranians would sacrifice 3/4th’s of their citizenry to rid the world of the arch Koran inspired eternal enemy Israel. Perhaps their great Caliphate will rise to push the button. That is the real worry – that they do not care for their own lives, their children’s lives or any life on earth at all. So, in the end – do we let them have the bomb or go to war to prevent it? As much as I hate to admit it and detest it – War is inevitable. It is just a matter of when.

Nov 08, 2011 4:33pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.