Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Romney: I will not let Iran get nuclear weapons

1 of 3. Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, participates in the CNBC Republican presidential debate in Rochester, Michigan, November 9, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Mark Blinch

WASHINGTON | Thu Nov 10, 2011 3:42pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney laid down a foreign policy marker on Wednesday, saying that if elected he would not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons.

An International Atomic Energy Agency report on Tuesday indicated Iran had worked to design nuclear bombs, testing Western powers anew in their standoff with Tehran, which insists it is developing a civilian nuclear program.

Romney, leading some polls of Republican voters in the race to be the party's 2012 presidential nominee, said he would be prepared to work with U.S. allies on a diplomatic solution but would be prepared to act unilaterally if necessary to stop Iran.

"Si vis pacem, para bellum. That is a Latin phrase, but the ayatollahs will have no trouble understanding its meaning from a Romney administration: If you want peace, prepare for war," he wrote in an opinion article for The Wall Street Journal.

He said he would start his presidency by imposing a new round of "far tougher" economic sanctions on Iran "together with the world if we can, unilaterally if we must."

"I will back up American diplomacy with a very real and very credible military option," he said, by maintaining a regular naval presence in the Mediterranean and Gulf region and by increasing U.S. military assistance to Israel.

"These actions will send an unequivocal signal to Iran that the United States, acting in concert with allies, will never permit Iran to obtain nuclear weapons," Romney said.

Successive presidents have attempted to stop or slow Iran's alleged march to a nuclear weapon, but Tehran's leadership has ignored the pressure.

Romney accused President Barack Obama of relying too heavily on international sanctions that had produced little progress.

"Sanctions clearly failed in their purpose. Iran is on the threshold of becoming a nuclear power," Romney wrote.

Obama has had a string of national security achievements, such as the killing of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, which may make it difficult for his 2012 opponent to attack him in that area.

Romney said the Obama administration had done little in response to an alleged Iranian plot to kill Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the United States.

"Only when the ayatollahs no longer have doubts about America's resolve will they abandon their nuclear ambitions," he wrote. (Reporting by Steve Holland; Editing by Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (41)
fromthecenter wrote:
Another tough talking republican? Taking a page out of the last cowboy’s diplomacy book? Yea, that worked out so well for us didn’t it?
What’s he going to do about Israel thumbing their nose at us and continuing to build settlements that were destined for a Palestinian state? Yea, that’s what I thought.

Nov 09, 2011 8:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Speaker2 wrote:
what’s happen with these republicans, same song and dance, cut spending, but not the military, bomb this country because they don’t agree for us. Even if Iran had the bomb, so does Israel, as I recall the US and Russia played the game of MAD, mutual assured destruction.

Hey, want toset an example, state you will get rid of all nukes in the USA, set an example.

Nov 09, 2011 9:03pm EST  --  Report as abuse
SvenBolin wrote:
The IAEA head Yukiya Amano is a renown U.S. puppet and he deliberately put a spin on the latest report. It has been internationally criticized. The US and its master Israel are playing with fire.

Nov 09, 2011 10:27pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.