Nixon nearly "blew my stack" over Watergate tape gap

WASHINGTON Thu Nov 10, 2011 2:56pm EST

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Richard Nixon told a U.S. grand jury that he "practically blew my stack" when he learned of the long gap on White House tape sought in the Watergate scandal investigation, according to transcripts released on Thursday.

In one of the biggest political scandals in American history, much has been made of the famous 18-1/2 minute gap on tapes of Nixon's White House conversations. The key question -- did it include incriminating information about the break-in at Democratic National Headquarters by his campaign operatives?

Nixon spent hours before the grand jury on June 23 and 24, 1975, almost a year after he resigned, because of his campaign's involvement in the attempt to bug his political opponents' offices at the Watergate complex.

Nixon, who died on April 22, 1994, was pardoned a month after he left the White House by his successor, President Gerald Ford. He was interviewed by the Watergate Special Prosecution Force before two grand jury members in California.

Questions were raised over whether his assistant, Rose Mary Woods, had erased the conversation when she was transcribing the tapes, though Nixon told the grand jury that initially the tape had not been covered by subpoenas.

"Rose had thought it was four minutes ... and now the counsel have found that it is eighteen and a half minutes, and I practically blew my stack," Nixon told the grand jury.

His testimony was released after noted historian Stanley Kutler, who has written extensively on the scandal and the former president, sued with others to get it released. Grand jury testimony is typically kept secret.

NIXON ORDERED PROBE INTO TAPE GAP

In office from 1969 to 1974, Nixon was the only U.S. president to resign, stepping down in the face of almost certain impeachment over a scandal that deeply damaged national trust in the White House and government.

Nixon also told the grand jury that he never heard the conversation that took place during the gap in the tape.

It has been widely known that the conversation was between Nixon and his chief of staff, H.R. Haldeman, after the break-in. But the content of the conversation has never been revealed.

"You do sometimes come back to the same question without intending to be repetitive, but I am pointing out I have never heard this conversation that you have alluded to," the former president said.

Nixon told the grand jury that he had the "most intensive investigation" to see who else may have been responsible for the erasure, including the Secret Service, but it came up empty.

Ultimately, when asked directly one last time about whether he had any other information about who was responsible or might have caused the erasure, Nixon flatly said "No, I have none." He later described what happened as an "accident."

At one point, Nixon tried to restrain himself from using curse words since he was widely known to swear frequently. But when one slipped out about finding out how the tape erasure happened, Nixon quipped "I am sorry, I wasn't supposed to use profanity. You have enough on the tapes."

In the middle of his deposition, Nixon received a dose of anti-coagulants. His doctor had said Nixon was unable to travel to Washington, D.C., for the questioning because of health reasons.

Throughout his interview, Nixon often noted that he could not recall specific events or conversations.

Some material was deleted from the testimony released on Thursday because it was deemed classified.

(Editing by Ross Colvin and Jackie Frank)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
badself wrote:
This doesn’t really seem like news. It seems like things a knew in 1974.

Nov 10, 2011 3:19pm EST  --  Report as abuse
JamieLaing wrote:
Perhaps this article got stuck in the news distribution machinery for the last 40 years?

Nov 10, 2011 3:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
cyberfool wrote:
“Classified”? I thought it was redacted because it dealt with people still alive, and therefore private & personal in nature.

Nov 10, 2011 3:43pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.