Fort Hood shooting victims, families file claims against Army

SAN ANTONIO, Texas Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:34am EST

U.S. Army soldiers hug in front of fallen soldier memorials for the shooting victims during the III Corps and Fort Hood Memorial Ceremony at Fort Hood, Texas, November 10, 2009. REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi

U.S. Army soldiers hug in front of fallen soldier memorials for the shooting victims during the III Corps and Fort Hood Memorial Ceremony at Fort Hood, Texas, November 10, 2009.

Credit: Reuters/Jessica Rinaldi

Related Topics

Photo

Air strikes in Gaza

Our latest photos from the scene.   Slideshow 

SAN ANTONIO, Texas (Reuters) - Dozens of relatives of people killed in a November 2009 shooting at Fort Hood -- as well as some of the wounded -- are filing administrative claims against the Army, seeking more than $750 million in total damages.

The lawyer representing the more than 80 claimants said on Thursday that the Army "acted in total disregard" for the safety of soldiers and civilian employees by allowing Major Nidal Hasan -- an Army psychiatrist charged in the killings -- to serve on active duty.

"They enabled him, they put him in a position to commit fratricide, and allowed him to commit the only deadly terror attack on U.S. soil since 9/11, and they knew all about it," the lawyer, Neil M. Sher of New York City, told Reuters.

Thirteen people died and 31 were wounded at the massive Texas Army post in the worst shooting ever at a U.S. military facility.

"The Army knew all about his beliefs, his radicalization, and, even knowing that, his superiors did absolutely nothing except promote him," Sher said. "That is inexcusable."

A Fort Hood spokesman said: "We are aware of the cases but are not able to speak to the specifics. The cases will be taken seriously and we will follow due process."

Among the claimants are family members of eight soldiers killed in the attack, and nine soldiers and one civilian who were wounded.

Those participating include Kimberly Munley, the civilian police officer credited with firing the shots that stopped Hasan, leaving him paralyzed from the waist down.

"I brought this claim because I strongly believe this tragedy was totally preventable, and that the Army swept under the rug what they knew about Hasan," Munley said in a statement.

Sher said the claims, which demand varying amounts of compensation, were filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The government has six months to respond and act, he said. If the Army denies the claims, Sher said he would be allowed to sue the government in federal court.

Hasan, who uses a wheelchair because of the injuries he suffered the day of the shooting, faces the death penalty if convicted at a court martial set to begin at Fort Hood in March.

(Additional reporting by Chris Baltimore; Editing by Corrie MacLaggan and Jerry Norton)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
HAL.9000 wrote:
Given the multitude of soldiers and officers in the military, it would be very easy for someone unstable to fall through the cracks…especially if Muslim, however in the post 9/11 world we can no longer afford to be politically correct all the time as well. If it talks like a terrorists and walks like a terrorists…it will be a terrorists regardless of the uniform it wears or oaths it may have taken.

The fact that he was an officer, educated and a psychiatrist underscores the point that anyone can be suspect when they start spouting radical Islamic ideals or beliefs that may lead to the deaths of others.

Nov 11, 2011 10:03am EST  --  Report as abuse
blitz2020 wrote:
Another reason why it should be made illegal to sue a Government Agency, only individuals citizens and businesses.

Let the plaintiffs in the lawsuit know, any money they take from the Army will mean less ammo and medical supplies for the soldiers in the field.

Nov 11, 2011 12:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.