UPDATE 4-US cities target protest camps, standoff in Portland

Sun Nov 13, 2011 10:41pm EST

* Arrests in several U.S. cities

* Police confront large crowd in Portland standoff

* Mayor cites crime at "Occupy Philly" camp

By Teresa Carson and Dan Cook

PORTLAND, Ore, Nov 13 (Reuters) - Police confronted an estimated 1,000 anti-corporate protesters in Portland, Oregon, on Sunday after clearing parks occupied by demonstrators for weeks, echoing moves in other U.S. cities to shut encampments.

More than 300 officers from about a dozen law enforcement agencies, some wearing riot gear, were deployed to evict Occupy Portland protesters from two downtown parks and maintain order in Oregon's largest city.

Police said more than 50 people were arrested after refusing to leave one of the parks but there were no injuries.

The demonstrators, described by observers as generally peaceful, regrouped in the streets, blocking traffic for hours. "The whole world is watching," they chanted during a standoff with police that continued through the afternoon.

Most of the crowd left as evening approached, but a core group moved to a downtown square to discuss their next move.

Encampments sprang up in several cities in recent weeks in solidarity with the Occupy Wall Street movement in New York to protest what demonstrators see as economic inequality and undue political influence by corporate interests.

But the sites have sparked complaints from business owners and officials who say they are urban eye sores.

Over the weekend officials moved to dismantle an Occupy protest camp in Salt Lake City, Utah, where 15 people were arrested, while Denver police on Saturday removed mattresses, cooking grills and tents illegally placed on a sidewalk.

Denver police said on Sunday that 17 people were arrested.

HEALTH AND SAFETY

Citing health and safety issues, some officials have urged demonstrators to dismantle the camps and others have used such concerns as reasons for police to force the issue.

Portland Mayor Sam Adams, who had warned the protesters last week that they would be evicted, told CNN on Sunday that the camps were linked to increases in crime and drug overdoses, and that one camp had been used as a cover by an arsonist.

While Adams expressed sympathy for protester goals, he said the Occupy movement needed to evolve beyond encampments "in order to get the kind of reforms we need."

In Philadelphia, Mayor Michael Nutter on Sunday ordered beefed-up police patrols at the city's protest site at Dilworth Plaza, saying conditions were "dramatically deteriorating."

He said communication had broken down between officials and protesters, and the city's concerns about fire hazards, litter and a lack of toilets had not been addressed. Thefts, assaults and an alleged sexual attack also had occurred, he said in a statement.

Nutter said a $50 million makeover of the plaza was planned and by opting not to move, "Occupy Philly is now purposely standing in the way of a nearly 1,000 jobs for Philadelphians at a time of high unemployment."

In Oakland, California, where police and demonstrators have clashed previously, the city issued a third eviction notice on Sunday, warning protesters they faced "immediate arrest" if they continued to camp out in its plaza and parks.

It offered alternative emergency accommodation at two local area homeless shelters, and provided a shuttle service to one that was not within walking distance of the encampments.

In St. Louis, Mayor Francis Slay has warned protesters they have to leave their encampment but has offered to continue talks to find a permanent place for the protest.

The nationwide protest movement, which started in New York in September, has voiced opposition to what the demonstrators see as an unfair concentration of wealth in the United States. Among other issues, they object to corporate excesses and bailouts of major banks.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (40)
ejhickey wrote:
Move ‘em on, head ‘em up,
Head ‘em up, move ‘em out,
Move ‘em on, head ‘em out Rawhide!
Set ‘em out, ride ‘em in
Ride ‘em in, let ‘em out,
Cut ‘em out, ride ‘em in Rawhide.

Nov 13, 2011 7:32pm EST  --  Report as abuse
I would be interested in hearing the protesters reactions to the allegations made by officials, the writers of this article didn’t even mention if they had made an attempt to ask.

Nov 13, 2011 8:01pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Somehow, I think if an anti-abortion group squatted on public land and refused to leave until abortion was made illegal, certain people for OWS would be against that. I know the left would…it’s only OK to hold public property hostage if you agree with them.
The point of course is Free Speech does not mean taking over land and not leaving until you get your way. That’s why they are losing support. They are the neighbor who wouldn’t leave, and America doesn’t like to be blackmailed. The TEA Party was heard, loudly, and they didn’t “occupy” anything until they got their way.
Beyond that, just exactly which ones of the hundreds of individual demands from this fractured, incoherent group do we need to submit to before they will leave? Is it the “Forgive my Student Loan” one? I hope not, because that won’t happen…not until you go protest the Universities where tuition has increased at 7x the inflation rate. That isn’t cost of living increase, that’s greed from “Professors” with 6 figure incomes. By the way, if you aren’t making big bucks after paying $80k for your Russian Literature degree, why do we have to pay your bill…you made the stupid choice. Is it the “Take all the rich people’s money” one? Even if we did, that wouldn’t pay 10% of the amount of debt Obama has racked up in just 3 years. I know, you’d just demand the next groups money after that. Maybe you should protest the White House, and the insane spending and crushing regulations (not the public safety ones which are needed, just the thousands of other Nanny State ones.)
America is tired of your holding our parks and local businesses hostage. We heard you, now go home and do something constructive to further your cause..before you have no support left at all.
To give some perspective, more people show up at your local Wal-Mart at 6AM on black Friday than you have in your protests. Shake off your foggy stupor and do something other than sit and whine and demand things from others.

Nov 13, 2011 8:40pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.