Google's Schmidt blasts Internet copyright bills

Related Topics

Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt speaks at The Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts November 15, 2011.   REUTERS/Brian Snyder

Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt speaks at The Sloan School of Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts November 15, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Brian Snyder

CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts | Tue Nov 15, 2011 4:03pm EST

CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts (Reuters) - Google Inc Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt blasted proposed legislation to tighten online copyright regulation on Tuesday, saying the bills would lead to censorship of the Internet.

Intended to combat the trade in pirated movies and music, the two bills would give copyright holders and law enforcement officials added powers to cut off websites and require search engines, payment collectors and others to block access.

"The solutions are draconian," Schmidt said during an appearance at the MIT Sloan School of Management. "There's a bill that would require (Internet service providers) to remove URLs from the Web, which is also known as censorship last time I checked."

Schmidt said content owners like Hollywood studios have a legitimate problem, since increasing trading of pirated movies threatens their revenue.

"Their business models are threatened by theft," Schmidt said. "We don't endorse it. Please don't do it. If you're doing it, stop. I hope that's very clear."

The legislation Schmidt opposed is called the PROTECT IP Act in the U.S. Senate and the Stop Online Piracy Act in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Instead, Schmidt recommended regulations based on tracing payments spent at websites offering illegal materials.

The remarks followed a letter to lawmakers opposing the bills from a group of Internet companies including Google, AOL Inc, eBay Inc, Facebook, Yahoo Inc and Twitter.

"We are concerned that these measures pose a serious risk to our industry's continued track record of innovation and job creation, as well as to our nation's cybersecurity," the companies wrote.

(Reporting by Aaron Pressman; Editing by Richard Chang)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Ramok wrote:
I always love how they bring up movies as a justification for censorship. Have you ever actually watched a pirated movie they look terrible. The people that are willing to degrade their viewing experience that much just to see something must be in serious financial difficulty and would not spend money on the movies anyway.

Nov 16, 2011 11:13am EST  --  Report as abuse
Michaelm1 wrote:
So, Eric, offer some non-draconian solutions that work for all of us. Otherwise, shut up and comply with the law.

Nov 16, 2011 5:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
CobraBKeX wrote:
I agree with Schmidt. If they do this for one thing, anyone can claim copyright on anything and request it to be blocked. Censorship on the net will not help anything and will do more harm than good.

Nov 16, 2011 9:04pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.