Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy
Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse. Read more at Counterparties
TransCanada, Nebraska to work on new Keystone route
LINCOLN, Neb |
LINCOLN, Neb (Reuters) - Nebraska and TransCanada Corp agreed on Monday to find a new route for the stalled Keystone XL pipeline that would steer clear of environmentally sensitive lands in the state.
Under pressure from green groups, the State Department last week ordered the company to find a new route for the line in a decision that set back the $7 billion, Canada-to-Texas pipeline by more than a year.
The pipeline would deliver 700,000 barrels a day of crude from Alberta's oil sands to Texas refineries. But environmentalists strongly oppose the project, because of the route, concerns about spills and carbon emissions from production of oil sands crude.
In the deal with Nebraska, the state would pay for the new studies to find a route that would avoid the Sandhills region and the Ogallala aquifer, which provides water for millions in the area.
"I believe we will put the routing issue completely behind us," said Alex Pourbaix, TransCanada's president of Energy and Oil Pipelines. "We have heard and we have listened to the people of the Sandhills."
The agreement will not change the timeline for a federal review, said a spokesman for the State Department, which has final approval for the project because it crosses an international border.
"Nothing has changed in the process since last Thursday's announcement as any new proposed routes will be subject to the thorough, rigorous and transparent review process we have undertaken throughout," said Mark Toner, deputy spokesman for the department.
"Given the process, we cannot provide a specific end-date, other than to say that based on the total mileage of potential alternative routes that would need to be reviewed, we anticipate the evaluation could conclude as early as first quarter of 2013," Toner said.
That means the Obama Administration will likely not have to deal with the politically charged issue until after the 2012 election.
Nebraska State legislators will vote on the deal on Tuesday, Mike Flood, the legislature's speaker said.
"TransCanada is willing to consider a route that sites the pipeline out of the Sand Hills," said Flood.
"This is our land. These are our people. We will pay for this. It's the right thing to do."
In Washington to lobby for Keystone, Alberta Premier Alison Redford said the announcement was "good news."
"It's something I can be more optimistic about now than I could have been this morning," said Redford, emerging from a meeting with House Speaker John Boehner.
But the Republican chairman of the House Energy and Commerce committee, who was part of the meeting in Boehner's office, was less optimistic the deal could lead to a quicker decision.
"If they look at rerouting, that takes a long time," committee chairman Fred Upton said.
(Additional reporting by Roberta Rampton in Washington and Paul Eckert in Guam, writing by Scott Haggett and Russell Blinch; editing by Rob Wilson, David Gregorio, Bob Burgdorfer and Carol Bishopric)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
“Nebraska and TransCanada Corp agreed on Monday to find a new route for the stalled Keystone XL pipeline that would steer clear of environmentally sensitive lands in the state.”
Why would they even take the risk to begin with? Let’s restate the obvious:
“Nebraska and TransCanada Corp attempted to build a pipeline that crosses the Ogallala aquifer, which provides water for millions in the area, but were forced to change plans after everyone realized that contaminating the water supply for millions of people was a pretty bad idea.”
Matter of fact if I was Canada I would quit selling oil to the US completely. Canada I believe is the largest importer of oil to the US. If they were to cut off that supply maybe it might wake a few politicians up.
The real reason to shut down this lame pipeline is because it’s another pipeline from Canada to our ports leaving the country. I see no compelling need to boost Canadian commerce with the rest of the world, using our soil to deliver their tar-oil to Corpus Cristi…. unless they’re going to give us 50% of the oil in the pipe as a transit fee. Until then, Canada…. this is us yawning.



Follow Reuters