New drama over U.S. taxes and spending looms

Sun Nov 20, 2011 6:27pm EST

Related Topics

* Payroll tax break, jobless benefits due to expire

* Republicans may not support an extension

By Andy Sullivan

WASHINGTON, Nov 20 (Reuters) - The "super committee" may be effectively dead but brinkmanship in Congress over taxes and spending will only escalate as the impending expiration of several provisions threatens to undermine the U.S. economy.

If Congress does not extend them by the end of the year, workers will see less money in their paychecks, nearly 2 million jobless people will lose the benefits that help them make ends meet, and Medicare patients may have a harder time getting in to see the doctor. Countless businesses will see their tax bills rise.

Analysts have warned that this effective tax increase, which would kick in on Jan. 1, could push the economy back into recession even as it struggles to recover from the last one.

Goldman Sachs economists warned that economic growth could slow by 1.5 percentage points in early 2012 if all temporary measures are allowed to expire. Analysts polled by the Federal Reserve project gross domestic product to grow at a rate of 2.4 percent next year.

"We don't want to get up in the morning and not have some short-term support for the recovery," said Paul Ballew, chief economist at Nationwide Insurance.

The uncertainty has frustrated businesses, which have begun to ramp up pressure on Congress to act.

President Barack Obama proposed extending some of these elements as part of his now-dead jobs package, and his fellow Democrats hoped to wrap them into any deal that might have emerged from the super committee.

Absent a deal, it will be much harder to pass those elements through a bitterly divided Congress as Republicans and Democrats try to present themselves as the best stewards of the U.S. economy in the 2012 election campaign.

Any super committee deal would have been fast-tracked through Congress. Votes would have been guaranteed in the House of Representatives and the Senate, and lawmakers would have been unable to change the bill.

The usual procedural hurdles that enable a single lawmaker to delay legislation by up to a week in the Senate would have been set aside.

Now, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid must find at least seven Republican votes and a week's worth of time to pass these elements through the Senate. There is no guarantee that Republicans, who control the House, will even bring them up for a vote.


Payroll tax cuts and jobless benefits are among the most effective ways to boost the economy because they put money in the hands of people who spend it quickly, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

Republicans backed a one-year payroll tax cut from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent and an extension of enhanced jobless benefits last year, but that was part of a larger tax package that included elements they wanted, such as an income-tax cut for the wealthy.

Many have said they are not inclined to extend the payroll tax for another year on the grounds that businesses would react more favorably to permanent changes in tax law.

Enhanced unemployment benefits likewise face widespread skepticism from Republicans.

Jobless benefits, which average $296 per week, normally run out after six months, but additional federal aid has stretched the deadline to as high as 99 weeks during an economic downturn that has created record numbers of long-term unemployed.

But after pushing for steep spending cuts all year, Republicans will likely to be reluctant to back these two provisions without further spending cuts to offset their combined cost of $168 billion.

"Certainly, we would want to make sure that they are paid for," the super committee's top Republican, Representative Jeb Hensarling, said on Fox News Sunday.

Other expiring elements are typically renewed without as much drama.

Congress has routinely pushed back a planned cut to doctors and hospitals who accept patients under the Medicare health program for the elderly, and will have to do so again at the end of this year, a move that has happened so many times it is known as the "doc fix" on Capitol Hill.

Other elements, such as a "patch" to the alternative minimum tax to prevent it from hitting middle-class taxpayers and business credits for research and new purchases, also are routinely extended.

Congress traditionally renews about 60 of these each year, though they were allowed to lapse for much of 2010 before being reinstated retroactively.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (6)
kiapa wrote:
so, we were looking for a $1.5 Trillion long-term reduction in the deficit… and we get ZERO. then, we get to add $300B to our deficit in the very short run because we keep kicking real fixes down the road… and our economy is too fragile to take any hits right now. yep, it’s the best government money can buy….

Nov 20, 2011 6:55pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Help Fix America First –

Nov 20, 2011 6:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
traffikator wrote:
So the Republicans would have us believe they are best able to fix this economy. What were they doing for 8 years? Oh I see, starting all sorts wars with countries that did not attack or threaten us, giving more money to to the super rich while taking away benefits from the poor and middle were surely successful principles. Now after blocking every possible plan to repair and boost this economy, they have the nerve to demand that be handed over the barely surviving remnant of the destruction they left behind? And if that was not bad enough, look the bunch of “barely able to read, remember, converse and write” set of imbiciles they want to lead! They never cease to amaze!

Nov 20, 2011 6:58pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.