Two Occupy Wall Street protesters sue NY police

Related Topics

Protesters affiliated with the Occupy Wall Street movement shout slogans to police officers while they march to the New York Stock Exchange November 19, 2011.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

Protesters affiliated with the Occupy Wall Street movement shout slogans to police officers while they march to the New York Stock Exchange November 19, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Eduardo Munoz

NEW YORK | Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:49pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Two Occupy Wall Street protesters on Monday sued the New York police for false arrest and excessive force arising from an incident at a Citibank branch in downtown Manhattan.

Heather Carpenter, a 23-year-old student, and her fiance, Julio Jose Jimenez-Artunduaga, a Colombian immigrant, who were charged with trespass and resisting arrest on October 15, filed a federal civil-rights lawsuit against the New York Police Department.

The charges against Jimenez-Artunduaga were dismissed Monday at the request of prosecutors and the Manhattan district attorney's office has indicated it will drop its case against Carpenter next month, her lawyer, Ronald Kuby, said.

According to the lawsuit, Carpenter had marched with other demonstrators to the bank to close her account to protest what they call predatory lending and unfair banking fees.

Outside the Manhattan federal courthouse Monday, Carpenter described how she closed her account with a teller while about 20 protesters held what they called a "teach-in" in the branch, describing their experiences with the bank.

After an employee asked the protesters to leave, police closed the doors and began arresting those inside. Carpenter had left the bank but was restrained outside by an undercover officer who had posed as a protester and "dragged" back into the bank, Kuby said.

Jimenez-Artunduaga was also arrested outside, Kuby said, and brought back into the bank. Both suffered minor injuries after being handled roughly, the lawsuit alleges.

Police department chief spokesman Paul Browne said in a statement that the pair were seen 'disrupting business inside the bank, and then slipping outside as arrests were under way, claiming falsely they were not engaged in the disruption."

(Reporting by Joseph Ax; Editing by David Storey)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
Tomthegreat wrote:
This was part of the plan all along. At Occupy Ottawa they have flyers which give instructions on how to sue the police.

Nov 21, 2011 3:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Who is paying for their lawyer? Do they work? Where did they get money to “Occupy” NY? Colombian immigrant? His civil right to sue but there are many questions.

Nov 21, 2011 5:28pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Buelligan wrote:
So the police can arrest people for going as a group to close accounts, and for discussing their experience with other patrons? If there was hair in my food at a restaurant and I complained in front of other patrons, would I get arrested? How much money would the Restaurant industry have to ‘donate’ to the police to get police protection from negative consumer feedback?

The fact that both cases will be dropped lets you know that the arrests were unjust.

Nov 21, 2011 5:54pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.