Merck to pay $950 million to settle U.S. Vioxx charge

Tue Nov 22, 2011 6:01pm EST

Bottles of the prescription arthritis and pain medication VIOXX sit on a shelf in New York, in a 2004 photo. REUTERS/Mike Segar

Bottles of the prescription arthritis and pain medication VIOXX sit on a shelf in New York, in a 2004 photo.

Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Merck & Co will pay roughly $950 million to settle criminal and civil charges that it promoted the painkiller Vioxx for an unapproved use, the U.S. Justice Department said on Tuesday.

The fine will conclude a long-running investigation into Merck's promotion of its one-time blockbuster drug, which was withdrawn from the market in September 2004 after being linked to heart risks.

The Justice Department alleged that Merck promoted the drug for treating rheumatoid arthritis before it had been approved for that condition by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The case is one of the largest settlements by a major pharmaceutical company over marketing drugs in the United States for uses that have not been approved by the FDA, known as off-label promotion.

"We will not hesitate to pursue those who skirt the proper drug approval process and make misleading statements about the safety and efficacy of their products," said Tony West, the Justice Department's assistant attorney general for the civil division, in a statement.

Merck pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge and will pay a $321.6 million criminal fine for introducing the misbranded drug Vioxx into interstate commerce.

It also agreed to pay an additional $628.4 million civil settlement to resolve additional allegations regarding its off-label marketing of Vioxx and alleged false statements about the pill's heart safety. The U.S. government will recover $426 million of that amount, while the remainder will go to the states in the lawsuit.


The Justice Department said Merck also agreed to a corporate integrity agreement to strengthen oversight over its marketing. Merck said the settlement does not mean it admits liability or wrongdoing.

"We believe that Merck acted responsibly and in good faith in connection with the conduct at issue in these civil settlement agreements, including activities concerning the safety profile of Vioxx," said Bruce Kuhlik, executive vice president and general counsel of Merck, in a statement.

The large American drugmaker had already told investors in October 2010 it was taking a $950 million charge related to the U.S. government probe.

The civil settlement agreement is signed with the United States and individually with 43 states and the District of Columbia, but previously disclosed litigation with seven states is still unresolved, Merck said.

States have said the company misled regulators about the dangers associated with Vioxx, which has been linked in lawsuits to increasing users' risk of heart attacks and other serious cardiovascular side effects.

In 2007, Merck also agreed to pay $4.85 billion to settle lawsuits filed by thousands of former Vioxx users, who alleged the pill caused heart attacks.

(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch and Anna Yukhananov; Editing by Tim Dobbyn and Carol Bishopric)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (6)
Global55 wrote:
Now I can see why the Merck CEO is no longer heading up the Penn State investigation.

Nov 22, 2011 4:12pm EST  --  Report as abuse
HemiHead66 wrote:
You’d have to be crazy to take anything these drug crony’s are putting out now-a-days. Their paid off FDA friends let them push whatever poison they come up with, they make billions of dollars off of it, then they kick-back a few hundred million in settlements. End result, mission accomplished. Stock price up, bonuses’ in pocket, everybody’s happy. Except for the poor ——– that’s lying in the grave.

Nov 22, 2011 5:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
USAPragmatist wrote:
From what I know about the Vioxx cases, this is a bargain for Merck.

Nov 22, 2011 5:40pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.