U.S. blocks key fund in climate agreement: report

Related Topics

LONDON | Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:03pm EST

LONDON (Reuters) - The U.S. is refusing to sign a flagship global climate fund as negotiations intensify ahead of the UN climate summit next week, the Financial Times reported on Thursday.

It quoted U.S. officials as saying the United States, backed by Saudi Arabia, had still not agreed to adopt a blueprint for the Green Climate Fund.

Countries agreed to create the fund last year to channel up to $100 billion a year by 2020 to help developing countries fight climate change and a U.N. committee completed the draft design of the fund at a meeting in South Africa in October.

Negotiators from around the world will consider the proposals at a climate summit in Durban from November 28 to December 9, as they try to agree on steps toward a global binding climate deal.

Earlier this month, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon urged governments in rich nations to work around troubled economic times and scale up donations to the fund that he said was at risk of becoming an "empty shell".

The U.S. never ratified the ailing Kyoto Protocol, which aims to reduce the risk of greater extremes of weather, rising sea levels and crop failures. Adopted in 1997, it entered into force in 2005 and subjects 37 richer countries to legally binding targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions during its 2008-12 first commitment period.

So far the world is failing to reduce carbon emissions sufficiently to contain global warming within the limit of 2 degrees Celsius that scientists say is necessary to avoid the worst effects of climate change.

The U.S. State Department had no immediate comment.

(Reporting by Michelle Martin; Editing by Myra MacDonald)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
nieldevi wrote:
The Party of NO has become the Country of NO. Game strategies are the default behavior of companies and governments. The “winner” mentality has taken over as the the daily diet.

Nov 25, 2011 2:16am EST  --  Report as abuse
TheNewWorld wrote:
@nieldevi

And why should we contribute to other nations? We are going bankrupt ourselves. We should cut 100% of foreign spending until we have a budget surplus. And even then I don’t want to be paying for other countries to participate in pseudo-scientific theories that prove to be wrong over and over.

Nov 26, 2011 3:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.