Canada won't confirm it's pulling out of Kyoto

OTTAWA Mon Nov 28, 2011 5:28pm EST

Environment Minister Peter Kent speaks during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa November 28, 2011.  REUTERS/Chris Wattie

Environment Minister Peter Kent speaks during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa November 28, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Chris Wattie

Related Topics

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada dismissed the Kyoto Protocol on climate change on Monday as a thing of the past, but declined to confirm a media report it will formally pull out of the international treaty before the end of this year.

Although the Conservative government walked away from its Kyoto obligations years ago, a formal withdrawal would deal a symbolic blow to global talks to save the agreement, which opened in Durban, South Africa on Monday.

Canada says it backs a new global deal to cut emissions of greenhouse gases, but insists it has to cover all nations, including China and India, which are not bound by Kyoto's current targets.

Although Japan and Russia share Canada's view, and the United States never ratified Kyoto, no nation has yet formally renounced the treaty.

"Kyoto is the past," Environment Minister Peter Kent told reporters in Ottawa, describing the decision by Canada's previous Liberal government to sign on to the protocol as "one of the biggest blunders they made."

The Conservatives - who green groups say are recklessly pushing development of the Alberta oil sands and ignoring the environment - complain the Liberals signed Kyoto and then did nothing to stop the country's emissions from soaring.

"What we know is that we cannot comply with it ... that's a fact," Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver told reporters.

CTV News said Ottawa would announce its formal withdrawal from Kyoto on December 23, once the Durban talks are over.

"I'm neither confirming or denying (the report)," said Kent, who announced Canada would spend C$600 million ($583 million) over the next five years to help improve air quality.

Peter Julian of the New Democrats said Kent's presence at Durban would be a total charade.

"He's going to go there to obstruct, bury progress, derail the discussions and act like an environmental vandal," Julian told the House of Commons.

Canada has long been the focus of environmentalists' ire and regularly wins "Fossil of the Day" awards at major international meetings.

"Countries should be asking themselves why Canada is sitting at the Kyoto negotiating table with a secret plan to formally withdraw from the protocol mere weeks after the talks end. This move is a slap in the face to the international community ... Shame on Canada," said Hannah McKinnon of Climate Action Network Canada.

Kent said the government - which has close ties to Western Canada's energy industry - wanted to meet its climate change commitments, but added that "we're not going to strand capital, we're not going to threaten jobs in any of the sectors".

Kyoto obliged Canada to cut emissions to 6 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. In 2009, Canada emitted 690 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, 17 percent above 1990 levels, largely because of an increase in oil extraction from the vast oil sands of northern Alberta.

The Conservatives subsequently adopted less ambitious targets and now say Canada will cut greenhouse gas emissions by 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020.

"We need a new agreement, a post-Kyoto agreement, that includes all of the major emitting countries, whether they be developed countries or developing countries," said Kent.

(Reporting by David Ljunggren; editing by Rob Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
Pllc15 wrote:
Symptom that the Kyoto Accord is losing steam and support by countries who signed off on it. A total sham not only from suspect scientific data but the absence of China, India and the signatories to the treaty leaves it meaningless.

Nov 28, 2011 6:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
taka.jp98 wrote:
Exactly, why bother, greenhouse gas never heard of it, ah wait a second I remember it has something to do with climate change. Perhaps it is better I wait and see and if I can squeeze eyes and ears maybe climate change will just pass on me or I pass on it.

Unless finger pointing comes out of fashion for politicians we can not expect to see any progress that would mount in a conclusive agreement.

Please do something useful with the money spent on those meetings, instead of the meetings itself.

Nov 28, 2011 7:25pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


California's historic drought

With reservoirs at record lows, California is in the midst of the worst drought in decades.  Slideshow