American Airlines seeks to shed planes, engines

Wed Nov 30, 2011 1:39pm EST

American Airlines planes sit at their gates while others taxi for arrival and departure at O'Hare International airport in Chicago November 29, 2011. REUTERS/Frank Polich

American Airlines planes sit at their gates while others taxi for arrival and departure at O'Hare International airport in Chicago November 29, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Frank Polich

Related Topics

(Reuters) - American Airlines wants to shed unwanted leases for 24 aircraft and their engines as the third-largest U.S. carrier begins cutting costs after filing for bankruptcy.

AMR Corp, the parent company, said it has a large number of aircraft on order, and breaking leases on older equipment will allow it to speed up its fleet renewal.

American Airlines was the lone major U.S. carrier to avoid bankruptcy in the last decade. The company now seeks to catch up to competitors by using Chapter 11 to bring down labor and fixed costs.

The company said in court documents that it leased the equipment, mostly MD-80 planes and their engines, when it anticipated greater demand for air travel.

However, "with the ongoing downturn in the economy and in travel, these same aircraft and engines have little if any marketable value and are no longer necessary to the debtors' operations."

It did not say in court papers how much it would save by shedding the leases, which are held by investors.

American Airlines declined to comment.

The company has a fleet of more than 600 jets.

The airline said the majority of the equipment has already been taken out of service and is stored in New Mexico.

The case is In re AMR Corp, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, No. 11-15463.

(Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Editing by Dave Zimmerman)

(This story corrects the type of planes to MD-80 in fourth paragraph)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Moneyman07 wrote:
Who was the lessor?

Nov 30, 2011 11:47am EST  --  Report as abuse
Harry079 wrote:
Those planes really don’t need all those engines do they?

With less engines what do you need two pilots for?

Heck pull out those seats and make people sit on milk crates.

Paint the planes like those third world countries paint their buses and have chickens and geese hanging out the windows. With less engines there is less chance of sucking fowl anyways.

Nov 30, 2011 1:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Sounds like it’s going to get a little more crowded in Tucson…

Nov 30, 2011 1:08pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.