Killer mold too risky in U.S. war on drugs: report

WASHINGTON | Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:55pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Using fungi to kill coca and other illegal drug crops would be a risky tactic, as there is not enough data about how to control these killer molds and what effect they could have on people and the environment, according to a U.S. study released Wednesday.

The U.S. Congress asked scientists to look into whether some types of fungi, called mycoherbicides, could stem the flow of illicit drugs into the United States by killing the plants used to make cocaine, marijuana and opium.

But scientists from the National Research Council, one of the national academies of science that advises U.S. policymakers, said evidence about the fungi was sketchy and incomplete.

"There are too many unresolved questions regarding efficacy -- whether they'll really perform in real-time conditions, and whether they'll be safe to non-target plants," said Raghavan Charudattan, chairman of the committee that prepared the report and professor emeritus in the University of Florida's department of plant pathology.

"We did not see any data where a high level of control could be achieved," he said.

Mycoherbicides are toxic fungi that have been used as an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical weedkillers. They can also be targeted to specific plants, and can reproduce themselves, staying in the soil for many years.

But using them on a large scale against illicit drugs has never been tested, Charudattan said. A fungus could kill anywhere from 10 percent to 60 percent of an infected drug crop. It could also fail completely because of too much rain or a drought.

An official from the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy said drug control policies should be grounded in evidence and research.

"There's way too much uncertainty surrounding the use of mycoherbicides and we have absolutely no intention of pursuing this as a counter-drug tool," the official said.

PRACTICAL CHALLENGES

Available evidence also does not address the practical challenges of trying to infect drug crops abroad.

Farmers could easily sabotage any herbicide campaign by using fungicides to protect their crops or cultivate plants resistant to the fungi. Growers could also attack any low-flying aircraft used to spray their crops.

And it is unknown whether the fungi could morph into chemical compounds known as mycotoxins, which are harmful to people, Charudattan said.

Mycoherbicides could also only be used with the permission of a country's government, which has proven a challenge in the past.

Colombia, the world's largest producer of cocaine, refused to approve such fungi to kill its coca plants when the United States proposed it in 2000.

The U.S. government has pushed experimentation with fungal pesticides in Colombia and other parts of Latin America and Asia as a way to combat drug crops.

In the 1990s, the U.S. Department of Agriculture conducted research into the mycoherbicides as a replacement for the chemical fungicides that are sprayed from crop dusters on coca and heroin-poppy crops.

In the past, natural fungal epidemics have killed off poppy crops in Afghanistan and coca crops in Peru.

Congress required government scientists to further study mycoherbicides against illicit drugs as part of a funding bill for the White House drug czar's office in 2006.

(Reporting by Anna Yukhananov; editing by Eric Beech)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
gregbrew56 wrote:
How many remember Paraquat? It’s an herbicide that the U.S. provided to Mexico to eradicate Cannabis. (THAT worked well!) The first thing growers will do (and did in the 70s) after “treatment” is harvest the crop and ship it to consumers. Do you want yourself, friends and family to consume mycoherbicides? What are mycoherbicides’ effects on human lungs and digestive system? Do you want U.S. citizens to be the beta testers of new toxins?

If your response is that “I don’t care, because neither myself, friends or family consume Cannabis!” then you are delusional and in denial. Look at the statistics on drug consumption in the U.S.

Regardless of your feeling about illegal drugs, any thinking person must agree that the war on drugs is an abject failure, and a just plain stupid waste of resources. Humans have always been seekers of different realities based on spiritual and/or chemical means. That will never change. Expecting otherwise is insanity.

Nov 30, 2011 2:05pm EST  --  Report as abuse
MidwestVoice wrote:
This is madness! What is to stop someone from obtaining these fungal compounds and spraying other plants, home gardens, etc? The US will never win the stupid war on drugs – where there is a demand, there WILL be a supply! So only drugs produced and sold by pharmaceutical companies are OK? Alcohol and prescription pain pills are OK (and profitable!) but we will poison anyone consuming marijuana? Really? This is the best idea they could come up with?

Wow – and the fact that they believe they have the right to spread this poison in other country’s ground demonstrates the extreme arrogance with which our country views the rest of the world. And we wonder why others neither like or trust us?!

Dec 02, 2011 3:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Tigergreen1 wrote:
When are we going to stop punishing the growers and start punishing the Users. If they did not buy the stuff, the market and the production would disappear.

If the drugs are needed for medical purposes, then would it not be worth considering the licencing of the poorest peoples to grow for a legal and closely monitored trade. Whoever, thought up the idea of spraying toxic fungi or anything else, over the crops, needs to have their head(s) exaamined. Thank goodness some scientists have more common sense than politicians.

Dec 06, 2011 3:46pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.