Wealth and Investing Center

As recession took hold, families sought cash help

Related Topics

Katie Busker, 30, plays with her fourteen-month-old niece Jonnalyn Gibbs in the aisles of the Independence Food Pantry in Independence, Iowa July 5, 2011. REUTERS/Jessica Rinaldi

Katie Busker, 30, plays with her fourteen-month-old niece Jonnalyn Gibbs in the aisles of the Independence Food Pantry in Independence, Iowa July 5, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jessica Rinaldi

WASHINGTON | Thu Dec 1, 2011 6:49pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The number of families collecting cash welfare benefits rose during the longest and deepest economic downturn in the United States since the Great Depression, the U.S. Census said on Thursday.

Caseloads in the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) program had fallen in the 1990s and leveled off in the early part of the 2000s.

Then the recession hit in 2007 and officially ended in 2009. The participation rate in the program rose to 4.8 percent of families with children under the age of 18 in 2009 from 3.8 percent in 2006. The number of benefit recipients rose to 1.7 million from 1.4 million.

Participation also rose in other federal aid programs, including those that help cover energy bills and grocery costs, the Census said.

"The report suggests that the recent economic recession impacted American families with children and that the impact was not just limited to TANF families or poor families," Shelley Irving, a demographer at the Census, said in a statement.

The program, which resulted from massive welfare reforms enacted under President Bill Clinton, sends $16.6 billion total each year to the states. They, in turn, make monthly cash payments to low-income families to help pay for food, clothing, housing and other needs. Many also provide one-time emergency payments.

Much of the increase during the recession came from families who used the benefits for a short period. The percentage of families who used TANF for part of the year jumped to 3.3 percent in 2009 from 2.1 percent in 2006.

Some of it also came from an unlikely source -- married couples.

"Married-couple families, who have the lowest overall rates of TANF participation, saw an increase in their participation rate from 2006 to 2009," Irving said.

In 2009, 1.9 percent of families headed by married couples received benefits, compared to 1.6 percent in 2006.

Cash benefits only make up about 41 percent of states' costs for the program. Nonetheless, three states have recently cut the benefit amounts, according to a report from the National Governors Association and National Association of State Budget Officers released earlier this week.

California cut benefits 8 percent, Nevada 1.8 percent, and Wisconsin 2.9 percent. Currently, Nevada has the highest unemployment rate in the country, followed by California.

Florida raised amounts by 4.1 percent this fiscal year, which started in July.

Other states left benefit amounts untouched, but changed their programs. Arizona residents now can only collect TANF for 24 months over their lifetimes, as opposed to the previous 36 months.

While unemployment became a bigger problem for families of all types during the recession and after -- the national jobless rate is 9 percent -- the Census found that parents were eager to solve the problem.

"Enrollment in programs to help find work and job skills programs increased for TANF and non-TANF families from 2006 to 2009," the report said.

(Editing by Eric Beech)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
lakshmanan_p wrote:
Spreading fear may induce quick on set of second recession, if the countries world over do not take corrective steps in time possibly through the UN.

Dec 01, 2011 7:31pm EST  --  Report as abuse
calvinbama wrote:
The lady in the picture looks like she could use an extended period of limited access to food

Dec 02, 2011 9:33am EST  --  Report as abuse
MidwestVoice wrote:
calvin – your childish post ignores the fact that in this country we subsidize the wrong foods. Sadly, the cheapest and most available food is the least nutritious and most fattening; look at cheap fast food ($1 items) that are stuffed with high fat and sodium and very little nutrition. Many low income families, the unemployed and under-employed simply can’t afford to buy healthy fresh foods and many do not even have local access to such.

Dec 02, 2011 1:51pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.