Israel's Barak plays down "shadow war" against Iran

Related Topics

Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak speaks at the Halifax Security Forum at the Westin Nova Scotian hotel in Halifax November 19, 2011.  REUTERS/Sandor Fizli

Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak speaks at the Halifax Security Forum at the Westin Nova Scotian hotel in Halifax November 19, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Sandor Fizli

JERUSALEM | Sat Dec 3, 2011 3:12pm EST

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Defense Minister Ehud Barak played down speculation on Saturday that Israel and U.S.-led allies were waging clandestine war on Iran, saying sanctions and the threat of military strikes were still the way to curb its nuclear program.

Barak was asked in an interview whether two explosions in Iran last month showed "the war has already begun" through sabotage.

"I don't think so," he told Channel Two television. "I think that the answer to your question is negative."

One of last month's explosions in Iran killed at least a dozen members of the Revolutionary Guards, including a general. Iran called it an accident that occurred while weapons were being moved.

The Iranians have suffered from computer viruses in industrial systems. Several nuclear scientists have been killed or disappeared over the years in what Tehran says were Israeli or U.S. covert operations.

The idea that such operations may have escalated to include spectacular blasts with double-digit death tolls has stirred concern in Israel, where some commentators warned of a possible spillover into reprisals by Iran or its sympathizers abroad.

Barak neither confirmed nor denied that Israel or Western powers were trying to delay Iran's uranium enrichment and missile programs through sabotage. But his remarks signaled doubt in the long-term efficacy of any such tactics.

"I have nothing to say about the actions themselves. I just say that if you compare the situation eight years ago, or four years ago, to today's situation, the Iranians are much closer to nuclear capability," he said.

"Therefore the sanctions have to be intensified, quick, determined ... and therefore everyone is saying that no option should be taken off the table," Barak added, using a phrase favored by Israel and the United States to show they consider military strikes on Iran's nuclear sites a last-ditch option.

Barak said Israel and the United States were coordinating closely on Iran, which denies seeking nuclear weapons and has vowed to retaliate for any preemptive attack.

But the Jewish state has sovereignty and ultimate responsibility for its security, Barak added - comments that, in the past, have been widely interpreted as a threat to strike Iran unilaterally if the Israelis deems diplomacy a dead end.

On Friday, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta used some of his strongest language yet to explain why Washington is wary of the consequences of any such action.

Addressing a pro-Israel forum in Washington, Panetta said an attack could disrupt the already fragile economies of Europe and the United States, trigger Iranian retaliation against U.S. forces, and ultimately spark a popular backlash in Iran that would bolster its rulers.

It also may not be effective. Panetta cited estimates from the Israelis that a military strike might set back Iran's nuclear program by one to two years "at best."

Iran has weathered several rounds of sanctions passed by the U.N. Security Council and Western powers. A U.N. watchdog report last month suggested Iran has worked on a nuclear bomb program, heightening the international pressure.

(Writing by Dan Williams; Editing by Peter Graff)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (7)
mward1921 wrote:
If wasn’t for world oil demand none of these issues would concern us or most of the civilized world. A Region where income is from one drug or the other “oil” an the people are proud and rich in culture and little to desire with a life guided in a history of turmoil and poverty.

Dec 03, 2011 4:45pm EST  --  Report as abuse
xcanada2 wrote:
I’d go further than Panetta, and say that any peremptory military attack on Iran, is a criminal act. If the US were the perpetrator, it would represent the complete takeover of our Middle Eastern policy by AIPAC, which has been planning this war for many years. Similarly, if Israel is the perpetrator, we should have nothing to do with it, except to support the International Criminal Court in bringing Israel to justice. If we are dragged into another Middle East war, hopefully the people will oust and jail the war-mongering US regime and all that goes with it. It appears that the American people are pretty much fed up with our present power elite. At good dose of $5-10 gasoline, and a deeper recession, could push them over the edge.

Dec 03, 2011 7:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Don’t worry brian-decree no one is going to attack Iran this is just posturing on part of Israel, economy is too fragile to handle another M.East war especially with Iran. A lot of European leaders have voiced concerns on the lastest sanctions for the central bank of Iran.
The Egpyt’s Islamic brotherhood will do the dirty work for you in the coming new year. Changes are coming with the same token I also hope a regime change takes place in Iran as well, only then will Iran move on to a better future.

Dec 03, 2011 11:42pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.