Supreme Court rejects worship at public school appeal

WASHINGTON Mon Dec 5, 2011 12:22pm EST

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court let stand on Monday a ruling that religious groups cannot use public schools facilities for worship services outside of normal school hours in a case about church-state separation.

The justices refused to review the ruling by a U.S. appeals court that upheld a New York City Board of Education policy against religious worship at its schools.

The Supreme Court rejected an appeal by the Bronx Household of Faith, an evangelical Christian church. It wanted to use a local school for Sunday religious services, including singing of hymns, prayer and preaching from the Bible.

The appeals court ruled that allowing church services in schools would violate the constitutional requirement on the separation of church and state. The services would send the message the government endorsed religion, it said.

The Bronx Household of Faith in 1994 applied to use a local middle school for its Sunday morning church services and was turned downs. It then sued, and a federal judge later granted an injunction allowing the services.

Under that injunction, a city official in 2009 estimated that about 60 congregations, including the Bronx Household of Faith, use classrooms and auditoriums for worship after school hours and on weekends. The appeals court set aside the injunction in ruling for the Board of Education.

Jordan Lorence, an attorney for the religious group, appealed to the Supreme Court. He said the policy against religious worship amounted to "viewpoint discrimination" and the appeals court authorized "censorship of private religious speakers."

"This court's review is needed to resolve an issue of exceptional and recurring importance, namely whether the government may exclude religious worship services from a broadly open speech forum," Lorence said.

New York City Corporation Counsel Michael Cardozo opposed the appeal.

He said most schools have after hours and weekend programs for children. Some children or their families may feel less welcome if they identify the school with a particular religion or congregation, he said.

"Children -- especially younger children -- are very impressionable and vulnerable; they think in absolutes, and they are likely to misconstrue a congregation's use of their school for its worship services as their beliefs being sponsored or supported by the school," he said.

The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal without any comment. Justice Sonia Sotomayor took no part in considering the case. She may have been involved in reviewing it previously as a federal judge in New York.

The Supreme Court case is Bronx Household of Faith v. New York City Board of Education, No. 11-386.

(Reporting by James Vicini, Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Bill Trott)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
JamVee wrote:
Don’t know that I agree. If a church were to “RENT” the facility from the school, then prayer in a school wouldn’t, necessarily imply wrongdoing. As a tenant, even tho’ it’s only for a few hours, wouldn’t they have a right to use it any way they choose, as long as it is “lawful”. I’m sure the school could use the money too. It isn’t specified in the story, but I’m guessing the church wasn’t paying any rent for such use.

Dec 05, 2011 1:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
eric258 wrote:
Organizations do pay for the use of the school; the fees (at least in the case of my organization) are more than the costs, so the school wants us to stick around. It’s a win/win for both parties and the taxpayer is not footing the bill.

Dec 05, 2011 9:17pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.