Members of the U.S. Navy Blue Angels fly over the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan as part of the 25th annual Fleet Week celebration in New York, May 23, 2012.  REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Maxim Hot 100

The world's most beautiful women as chosen by Maxim readers.  Slideshow 

Shreen Mohammad sits with other recruits during a military exercise at the Kabul Military Training Center (KMTC) in Kabul March 28, 2012. A landmark NATO summit in Chicago endorsed an exit strategy that calls for handing control of Afghanistan to its own security forces by the middle of next year but left questions unanswered about how to prevent a slide into chaos and a Taliban resurgence after allied troops are gone. Picture taken March 28, 2012.   REUTERS/Omar Sobhani (AFGHANISTAN - Tags: POLITICS MILITARY SOCIETY) ATTENTION EDITORS: PICTURE 18 OF 27 FOR PACKAGE 'AFGHAN ARMY RECRUIT'

Afghan army recruit

A look at an Afghan recruit as he goes through the process of joining the Afghan National Army.  Slideshow 

SEC warns on congressional insider trading ban

Robert Khuzami, Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Enforcement, describes insider trading charges against three hedge fund portfolio managers and one hedge fund analyst during a news conference in New York February 8, 2011.  REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Robert Khuzami, Director of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Enforcement, describes insider trading charges against three hedge fund portfolio managers and one hedge fund analyst during a news conference in New York February 8, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

WASHINGTON | Tue Dec 6, 2011 1:58pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An explicit ban on insider trading by federal lawmakers could narrow existing law covering the conduct, a top Securities and Exchange Commission official warned on Tuesday.

Any changes need to be "carefully calibrated" so that they do not hurt insider trading prosecutions outside of Congress, enforcement director Robert Khuzami told a House panel.

The House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday considered legislation that would prohibit members of Congress and their staff from trading in securities or commodities based on non-public information gleaned through their jobs.

The bill has languished in Congress for the past five years, but saw renewed interest after a recent television report on "60 Minutes" that found some lawmakers profited from inside information.

The chairman of the House committee, Spencer Bachus, was one of the lawmakers singled out by the report for trading stock options after a Treasury briefing about the economic collapse in 2008. At Tuesday's hearing, he said he would schedule a markup of the legislation.

"In practice, we have never seen these rules applied to Congress," said Representative Louise Slaughter, a Democrat from New York who introduced the bill. "We want to remove any current ambiguity."

"We are trying to set the bar higher for members of Congress," said Representative Timothy Walz, a Democrat from Minnesota who co-sponsored the bill.

While the SEC prosecutes insider trading under general anti-fraud provisions, the agency has never used the laws to go after members of Congress.

The bill could narrow some existing laws, Khuzami said.

The proposed legislation targets information related to pending legislation, for example, and might exempt information obtained through a regulatory briefing, he said.

Khuzami suggested lawmakers instead create an explicit fiduciary duty between members of Congress to keep information gained on the job confidential and not use it for private gain. The agency would be able to use that general duty to go after insider trading in Congress, he said.

"Highlighting a duty by members of Congress ... is the simplest way to go," he said.

The existing proposal had support in the single digits before the 60 Minutes report, but won 171 co-sponsors in recent weeks, Slaughter said.

A Senate panel considered similar legislation last week.

(Reporting by Aruna Viswanatha; editing by Matthew Lewis)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
actnow wrote:
Insider trading by members of Congress raises serious questions about how they choose to influence the use of tax dollars and the very laws that govern our lives. They must be held to the same standard as the rest of us. If it is a crime for us, it should be a crime for them.

Dec 06, 2011 5:22pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Sumflow wrote:
Congress passed a law making insider trading illegal for the private sector and exempted itself by avoiding prompt reporting requirements. The insider trading loophole, that they give themselves is that they use time to hinder procession and cover things up. The SEC cannot have adequate enforcement without prompt disclosure. People calling for longer disclosure times probably just want more time to cover corrupt activities, and have more time to destroy evidence.

Congress hampers adequate enforcement of the securities laws, by refusing prompt public disclosure. The laws apply, but are unenforceable against elected public officials, because they refuse to disclose information in the time permitted for everybody else. The delayed reporting of securities transactions, defeats, obstructs, and impairs its use as timely evidence. If this STOCK act with long 90 day reporting times passes, it will just confirm what the people already suspect about a double standard for congressional insider trading.

The STOCK act allows congress people to by puts and calls, options and stocks, all day long without reporting anything, as long as each individual trade is under $1,000.00. Self-interested congressional officials do not want to put an end to the lucrative trading opportunities that are made available to them when they receive important nonpublic

Dec 07, 2011 2:17am EST  --  Report as abuse
Sumflow wrote:
The way to catch these people is to have real time disclosures of securities trades. Their constituents can send them back, or throw them out. If they fail prompt disclosure, put them in jail, just like corporate insiders the pursuit of quality information is merely a good business practice. The crime that can be proven is failing to disclose, they can inside trade as much as there voters allow.

Dec 12, 2011 8:43am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.