Australia court lifts Samsung Galaxy Tab sales ban

SYDNEY Thu Dec 8, 2011 8:24pm EST

Visitors walk past Samsung Electronics' Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablets on display at a registration desk at the headquarters of South Korean mobile carrier KT in Seoul October 13, 2011.  REUTERS/Jo Yong-Hak

Visitors walk past Samsung Electronics' Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablets on display at a registration desk at the headquarters of South Korean mobile carrier KT in Seoul October 13, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Jo Yong-Hak

SYDNEY (Reuters) - An Australian court on Friday lifted a ban on the sale of Samsung Electronics' Galaxy tablet computer in the country, adding to a U.S. legal victory for the South Korean technology firm in its bruising battle with Apple Inc.

The latest move by the High Court allows Samsung to offer the device Australian shoppers in time for the busy Christmas shopping season.

Samsung and Apple are locked in the biggest legal battle for the global technology industry across 10 countries as the they jostle for the top spot in the fast-growing smartphone and tablet computer markets.

The Australian court decision follows a U.S. court ruling that denied Apple's plea to ban Galaxy phones and tablets. Apple has appealed the U.S. decision.

Apple has accused Samsung of "slavishly" ripping off its designs, while Samsung has launched suits against Apple.

Samsung's Galaxy tablet 10.1, which is considered one of the main alternatives to Apple's iPad has been kept out of the Australian market since late July.

The Australian market, while not huge is the first launch market for Apple products outside the United States.

In late November, Samsung won a rare legal victory after an Australian Federal Court unanimously decided to lift a preliminary injunction, imposed by a lower court, on sales of Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1.

Apple had appealed the decision in the High Court, which is the final court of appeal. Apple could not be reached for comment immediately.

Samsung is the world's top smartphone maker, but a distant second to Apple in tablets.

The quarrel has triggered expectations that some of the pair's $5 billion-plus relationship may be up for grabs. Samsung counts Apple as its biggest customer and makes parts central to Apple's mobile devices.

Samsung shares were trading 1.2 percent lower at 0102 GMT, while the broader Seoul market was down 1.9 percent.

Global tablet sales are expected to explode to more than 50 million in 2011. Apple, which has sold more than 30 million iPads so far, is expected to continue to dominate the market in the near term.

Now has also entered the fray with its Kindle Fire tablet, but Samsung's Galaxy line-up is widely deemed the closest rival in terms of capability and design to the iPad.

The legal battle in Australia doesn't stop at tablet computers. Samsung has sought to block sales of Apple's latest iPhone 4S, which went on sale in early October, by filing preliminary sales injunction requests in four countries including Australia.

An Australian court has agreed to hear that case in March and April of 2012, with sales allowed to continue as normal ahead of the hearing on alleged patent infringements.

Samsung said on Friday that a French court had rejected its request to ban sale of the latest iPhone in that country.

(Writing by Narayanan Somasundaram; Editing by Lincoln Feast)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
TheCrustedOne wrote:
Poor Apple, they tried to patent enforce all document scrolling on a tablet. the money wasted by this rediculous lawsuit could have been givent to the stock holders!

Dec 08, 2011 9:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Neurochuck wrote:
You can read a more detailed account here from a local news media:
The High Court decision seems to reject the granting of a import and sales injunction/ban against a competitors product at launch, based on an *accusation* of intellectual property infringement, pending later court handling of the merits of the claim. But I’m not a lawyer.
As a software person, it really p*sses me off that Apple could block sales of a more open Android based device, and force me into the closed world of Apple only, based on some cosmetic similarity, or the equivalent design characteristic of brake pedal left of accelerator pedal in motor vehicles. What if each manufacturer had to be different ?
The US patent system seems corrupt, confused and very expensive. Extension of its rulings etc to Australia is seen as one of the big negatives of the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement. Beware of US FTA’s if your nation wants to have any innovative technology industries.

Dec 08, 2011 11:21pm EST  --  Report as abuse
BigMagoo wrote:
This sick thing about the ban is that Samsung made a digital photo frame that looked just like a smaller version of the Galaxy Tab back in 2006. If anybody copied anybody, Apple copied their design from that photo frame. This would be like somebody making a TV that looks just like an iMac, and then suing Apple after they make one of their own for “copying” the design. It’s just ridiculous that the ban ever passed.

Dec 14, 2011 10:47am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Retirement Road Map