Gingrich fuels more Mideast conflict: Palestinians

RAMALLAH, West Bank Sat Dec 10, 2011 7:58am EST

Saeb Erekat, the Palestinian Authority's chief negotiator, speaks at a Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) forum in Tel Aviv November 2, 2011.  REUTERS/Nir Elias

Saeb Erekat, the Palestinian Authority's chief negotiator, speaks at a Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) forum in Tel Aviv November 2, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Nir Elias

Related Topics

Photo

Air strikes in Gaza

Our latest photos from the scene.   Slideshow 

RAMALLAH, West Bank (Reuters) - Palestinian leaders said on Saturday U.S. Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich had invited more conflict in the Middle East by calling the Palestinians an "invented" people who want to destroy Israel.

Saeb Erekat, a senior Palestinian official, described his comments in an interview as "despicable." Hanan Ashrawi, another top official, said Gingrich's "very racist comments" showed he was "incapable of holding public office."

"This is the lowest point of thinking anyone can reach," Erekat, a close advisor to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, told Reuters. Such comments served only to "increase the cycle of violence," he added.

"What is the cause of violence, war in this region? Denial, denying people their religion, their existence, and now he is denying our existence," said Erekat, for years a leading figure in peace talks aimed at the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.

In an interview on Friday with the Jewish Channel, Gingrich predictably sided with Israel in its conflict with the Palestinians, who are seeking a state of their own on land occupied by Israel in a 1967 war.

But the former speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives departed from official U.S. policy that respects the Palestinians as a people deserving of their own state based on negotiations with Israel.

"Remember, there was no Palestine as a state. It was part of the Ottoman Empire" until the early 20th century, said Gingrich, who has risen to the top of Republican polls with voting to start early next year to pick a nominee to challenge Democratic President Barack Obama in the November 2012 election.

NO "CONTRIBUTION TO PEACE"

"I think that we've had an invented Palestinian people who are in fact Arabs, and who were historically part of the Arab community. And they had a chance to go many places, and for a variety of political reasons we have sustained this war against Israel now since the 1940s, and it's tragic," he said.

There are around 11 million Palestinians around the world, Palestinian officials say. They include refugees and their descendants who left or were forced to flee their homes during the 1948 war that led to the creation of Israel. More than 4 million of them live in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

The 1948 war erupted after Arab states rejected a U.N. plan that would have divided British mandate-ruled Palestine into Arab and Jewish states.

Gingrich along with other Republican candidates are seeking to attract Jewish support by vowing to bolster U.S. ties with Israel if elected.

He said both the Hamas militant group, which controls the Gaza Strip, and the Palestinian Authority, which receives financial backing from the United States, represent "an enormous desire to destroy Israel."

While Hamas remains committed to armed "resistance" and will not recognize Israel, the Palestinian Authority based in Ramallah states that only peaceful means can deliver Palestinian statehood and its security forces cooperate with Israel.

Ashrawi, a member of the Palestine Liberation Organisation Executive Committee, said Gingrich's remarks harked back to days when the Palestinians' existence as a people was denied by Israelis such as Golda Meir, prime minister from 1969 to 1974.

"It is certainly regressive," she said. "This is certainly an invitation to further conflict rather than any contribution to peace."

"This proves that in the hysterical atmosphere of American elections, people lose all touch with reality and make not just irresponsible and dangerous statements, but also very racist comments that betray not just their own ignorance but an unforgivable bias," she said.

Fawzi Barhoum, a Hamas spokesman in Gaza, said the Gingrich remarks "were grave comments that represented an incitement for ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians."

(Additional reporting by Nidal al-Mughrabi in Gaza; Editing by David Cowell)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (24)
amos033 wrote:
Gingrich is correct. Look at this Scripture:
“Yea, and what have ye to do with me, O Tyre, and Zidon, and all the coasts of Palestine? will ye render me a recompence? and if ye recompense me, swiftly and speedily will I return your recompence upon your own head; ecause ye have taken my silver and my gold, and have carried into your temples my goodly pleasant things: The children also of Judah and the children of Jerusalem have ye sold unto the Grecians, that ye might remove them far from their border.” Joel 3:4-6

Dec 10, 2011 8:58am EST  --  Report as abuse
GreenMarine wrote:
Is anyone surprised that Gingrich would want to lick the boots of the Israel lobby?

If people are “invented,” it is much easier to steal from them. I’m sure Gingrich’s equivalent in early America would have said the same thing about Native Americans– “they’re invented, didn’t you know, so stealing their land is in fact upright Christian behavior…”

Why won’t Israel apologists just honestly say what everybody knows: Israel wants to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians from the West Bank so there can be a “pure” Jewish state. Just say it: you think Palestinians are subhumans so it is ok for you to take their land.

Dec 10, 2011 9:10am EST  --  Report as abuse
GreenMarine wrote:
@Amos

Isn’t it convenient to follow parts of an ancient book, while ignoring others? Love thy neighbor? Thou shalt not steal? Love thine enemy? Thou shalt not eat shellfish? Disobedient children should be stoned to death?

Let me guess, your imaginary super best friend told you which parts others must accept and which parts you can ignore.

Dec 10, 2011 9:19am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.