Editor's Choice

U.S., Russia work to expand cyberspace cooperation

Related Topics

WASHINGTON | Fri Dec 9, 2011 8:06pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Russia and the United States are planning a regular exchange on "technical threats" that appear to come from computers in each other's territories, a White House spokeswoman said on Friday, even as bilateral ties have come under growing strains.

A range of mechanisms aimed at confidence building and crisis prevention are being planned to cope with alarming events in cyberspace, said Caitlin Hayden, a spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council.

These include "regular exchanges on technical threats that appear to emanate from one another's territory" as well as "no-fail communications mechanisms to help prevent crisis escalation and build confidence," she said in an emailed reply to a query.

Some such links have existed for years, including the Nuclear Risk Reduction Center, but others are "cyber-specific and would begin working with Moscow for the first time," Hayden said, without giving a projected start date.

A representative of the Russian Embassy in Washington did not return a phone call seeking comment.

Vice President Joe Biden said last month the United States was working with Moscow to link computer emergency response teams and the nuclear risk reduction centers and setting up lines of communication in case of "an alarming incident."

"It's a great deal harder to assess another nation's cyber-capabilities than to count their tanks," he told the London Conference on Cyberspace on November 1 by videocast.

Howard Schmidt, the White House cybersecurity coordinator, said in a July 12 blog that the United States and Russia planned to have three types of cybersecurity-related cooperative mechanisms in place by the end of this month, including special "24/7" communications links.

Hayden, the spokeswoman, declined to spell out the status of the talks with Russia, referring only to "ongoing diplomatic discussions." No such links were being announced for now with China or any other country, she said.

Strains between Washington and Moscow over Russia's disputed parliamentary elections are threatening President Barack Obama's "reset" policy, and the two countries remain at odds over NATO missile defense plans in Europe.

In another sore point, a U.S. intelligence report to Congress in October said Russia's intelligence services "are conducting a range of activities to collect economic information and technology from U.S. targets."

"We judge that the governments of China and Russia will remain aggressive and capable collectors of sensitive U.S. economic information and technologies, particularly in cyberspace," the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive, a U.S. intelligence arm, said.

Schmidt, in his blog, did not speak of any attempt to reduce the risk of spying but rather of heading off threats to both sides such as "botnets," a collection of computers that can be used to swamp a web site with incoming traffic or other malicious action.

Another goal, he said at the time, was to better understand each other's military view on operating in cyberspace.

"It's a prime example of the 'reset' in relations taking on a new and important dimension," Schmidt wrote then.

(With additional reporting by Diane Bartz)

(Reporting by Jim Wolf; editing by Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
What a paradoxical agreement between 2 sworn enemies having just apparent ties because of their own nuclear capabilites.
Can one really believe this will work? Stuxnet and Duqu was state sponsored virus for sabotaging nuclear activities, beleived to have originated in USA and that is very disconcerting only because what if someone altered this program and actually started a nuclear war sitting somehwere in an obscure country. The threat coming from unknown IP addreses is least of our worries however annoying to local stand alone comptures worldwide. I just have my doubts on this one though!

Dec 10, 2011 12:05am EST  --  Report as abuse
This is a great symbolic gesture to maintain some facade in the spirit of cooperation among those two countries where animosity historically runs very deep unfortunately for very compelling reasons between two nations. It is doubtful that such an accord will be of any meaningful significance for the following reasons:

The US operates the largest and most advanced electronic and signal intelligence data “vacuum cleaner” in the world pilfering data out of everything that has electronic components and processes any kind of data for further analysis to see if it is of any interest and value to Americans. America along with the UK, Canada, Australia and NZ also maintains a very significant offensive cyber attack capabilities. Needless to say that Russians are very paranoid about being taken offline in every conceivable sense of the word if the US deems it necessary.

2) Russian government purposely used the denial of service attacks even on non kremlin connected popular media outlets which made them inaccessible !within their own country! and knocked many sites offline which have been been critical of fake democracy, the “united” russia party and putin in that society. Can anybody really trust that type of illegitimate crooks who run that regime at the present time to respect any type of international agreements on cyber cooperation?

Unless another fair and transparent election takes place and the results of most recent election which have been totally corrupted and violated is invalidated the reset is pretty much dead. The US does not treat most oppressive regimes on this planet very kindly to put it mildly. Only the dictators under the thumb of the white house and pentagon are tolerated.-:)

Dec 12, 2011 1:44am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.