Trump debate still on, says conservative U.S. publisher

WASHINGTON Mon Dec 12, 2011 6:05pm EST

Donald Trump speaks to members of the media after a meeting with Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich at Trump Towers on 5th Avenue in New York, December 5, 2011. REUTERS/Andrew Burton

Donald Trump speaks to members of the media after a meeting with Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich at Trump Towers on 5th Avenue in New York, December 5, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Andrew Burton

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Conservative publisher Newsmax said it is going ahead with a planned December 27 Republican presidential "debate" moderated by Donald Trump and featuring candidates Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum, despite controversy generated by one of its star attractions.

Christopher Ruddy, the founder and CEO of Newsmax, which operates both a conservative magazine and website, said that because all Republican presidential hopefuls other than Gingrich and Santorum have said they won't participate in the event, the format is expected to be a "conversation" between Trump and the two candidates rather than a full-blown debate.

"It will be a debate, conversational style," Ruddy said in an e-mail to Reuters on Monday.

In a statement posted on its website, Newsmax reported that Gingrich would "join Trump and former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum for a conversation about how they plan to defeat President Barack Obama and make American great again."

Ruddy's description of how the format of the event has evolved from a full-scale debate into a smaller-scale conversation is the latest twist in what appears to have been a struggle by Newsmax to cope with the whims and egos of both the mogul invited to host the event and the politicians it invited to participate in it.

Last Friday, Trump was quoted saying that he was unsure if he was going to host the Newsmax event. "I don't know. I have to look into it," he told the "Imus in the Morning" show on Fox Business News. Trump indicated he had not entirely foreclosed the possibility of running for president himself as an independent.

Ruddy indicated that in a subsequent conversation, Trump said he still intended to participate in the December 27 event.

Trump's continuing threats to mount his own presidential bid, have been cited by other Republican hopefuls as reasons for their decisions not to participate in the debate hosted by Newsmax, whose editorial policy generally consists of broadly supporting conservative and Republican causes and candidates.

The website has teamed up with Ion TV, a national broadcaster, and claims to be able to deliver an audience of up to 10 million viewers.

At one point, a person involved in the debate negotiations said candidate Michelle Bachmann, a conservative congresswoman, also told Newsmax she would participate in the event. But the source said she later backed out after Trump declined her repeated pleas for his endorsement.

Other candidates who have declined to participate in the Newsmax event include Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, and Rick Perry.

Newsmax claims that the event has been endorsed by an assortment of prominent conservatives, including anti-tax activist Grover Norquist and former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin.

A rapidly growing presence in conservative media circles, Newsmax was founded by Ruddy, a former New York Post journalist who made his reputation reporting on conspiracy theories surrounding the death of Vincent Foster, an aide to former President Bill Clinton.

A minority owner of Newsmax is Richard Mellon Scaife, a controversial Pittsburgh philanthropist who is a long-time supporter of conservative causes.

(Reporting By Mark Hosenball)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
ryan834455 wrote:
Who are these people supporting for Dangerous Newt? It’s like voting for Vladimir Putin as president of the US. America was founded on Liberty in the form of our constitution. Newt wrote in a forward for the book Creating a New Civilization that he wants a new civilization, and enforced the book which states the US Constitution must Die! We have a treasonous snake running on the platform of Destroy America, and people vote for him? When you turn 18 and are allowed a vote in our system, there’s a great responsibility placed on you. If you vote for “the front runner” and ignore the fact that he has and will again stab your country in the back, you violate the trust that America has placed in you. Please take a few minutes to read about the man. Don’t read what Romney is saying which is mostly name calling and distracts from the facts. Look at the facts yourself. Why were 84 ethics complaints filed against him; why was he forced to pay $300,000 for fraud; why would you turn your back on America by voting for him?

Dec 13, 2011 12:08am EST  --  Report as abuse
greyleigh wrote:
I will watch the debate if Buddy Roemer and Jon Huntsman are participating. Otherwise, I see no reason to watch. There’s noone of interest in the GOP besides those two.

Dec 13, 2011 12:49am EST  --  Report as abuse
The real problem is that Trump has continued to voice that he is thinking of entering the Presidential “circus” as a Republican candidate or even entering as a third party candidate. If this is true, the potential downside to a candidate, who would engage in a debate moderated by Trump, might be that as moderator, “The Donald” could “throw darts” when and where he wants. Making himself look like a more viable candidate. How about Trump not pretending that he is a “King Maker”, and declare once and for all that he is a Republican candidate, and enter into the debate. It is time for Trump to either “Put Up, Or Shut Up!”. I say he will never declare. He gives too much money to Democrats, and thus I contend that he is nothing more that a “Cat’s Paw” for Hillary Clinton. Donald Trump is a nothing more than a “Trojan Horse” Lord Howard Hurts freedomfiles.blogspot.com

Dec 13, 2011 6:59am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.