Canada, out of Kyoto, must still cut emissions: U.N.

LONDON Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:50pm EST

Australia's Minister for Climate Change Greg Combet (L) speaks with Canada's Environment Minister Peter Kent during a break in plenary session at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP17) in Durban December 10, 2011. REUTERS/Rogan Ward

Australia's Minister for Climate Change Greg Combet (L) speaks with Canada's Environment Minister Peter Kent during a break in plenary session at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP17) in Durban December 10, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Rogan Ward

Related Topics

LONDON (Reuters) - Canada still has a legal obligation under U.N. rules to cut its emissions despite the country's pullout from the Kyoto Protocol, the U.N. climate chief said Tuesday.

Christiana Figueres also said the timing of Canada's move, a day after a deal to extend it was clinched at a U.N. summit in South Africa, was both regrettable and surprising.

Canada Monday withdraw from Kyoto, dealing a symbolic blow to the treaty, with environment minister Peter Kent breaking the news just after his return from talks in Durban.

"Whether or not Canada is a party to the Kyoto Protocol, it has a legal obligation under the (U.N. framework on climate change) convention to reduce its emissions, and a moral obligation to itself and future generations to lead in the global effort," Figueres said.

Canada, a major energy producer which critics say is becoming a climate renegade, has long complained Kyoto is unworkable because it excludes so many significant emitters.

Industrialized countries whose emissions have risen significantly since 1990, like Canada, remain in a weaker position to call on developing countries to limit their emissions, Figueres said.

"I regret that Canada has announced it will withdraw and am surprised over its timing," Figueres said in a statement.

Sunday, more than 190 countries agreed to extend Kyoto for at least five years and hammered out a new deal forcing all big polluters for the first time to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

Kyoto's first phase, due to expire at the end of next year but now extended until 2017, imposed limits only on developed countries, not emerging giants like China and India. The United States never ratified it.

The Canadian government said it would be subject to penalties equivalent to C$14 billion ($13.6 billion) under the terms of the treaty for not cutting emissions by the required amount by 2012.

China and Japan said Tuesday that Canada's decision was regrettable and called on it to continue to abide by its commitments on climate change.

Figueres said the Durban agreement to a second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol is essential "for the new push toward a universal, legal climate agreement in the near future."

(Reporting by Nina Chestney; Editing by Alessandra Rizzo)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
bee1gee wrote:
Thanks Canada for acting like you are holier than thou – whining about acid rain, whining about arctic ice, but when it push comes to shove, you choose to have the option to pollute. Dont throw stones from your glass house ever again.

Dec 13, 2011 1:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Bob__ wrote:
Doesn’t the left look foolish for blaming Bush for Kyoto’s failure?

Shouldn’t we blame Canada and (oh my god) Obama? No, couldn’t do that!

Dec 13, 2011 1:57pm EST  --  Report as abuse
0zXy70aB4T wrote:
The UN is an antiquated, worthless organization.
Canada…. tell the stupid UN to go fly a kite.

Dec 13, 2011 2:06pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.