Hunger up in U.S. cities, more to come: mayors

Related Topics

Volunteer Charlene Bennett fills an order at the North Fulton Community Charities food bank in Alpharetta, Georgia in this picture taken June 4, 2008.  REUTERS/Tami Chappell

Volunteer Charlene Bennett fills an order at the North Fulton Community Charities food bank in Alpharetta, Georgia in this picture taken June 4, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Tami Chappell

WASHINGTON | Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:37pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A survey of 29 cities shows hunger has risen in most of them in the last year and is largely expected to increase in 2012 as the United States faces a sluggish economy, the U.S. Conference of Mayors said on Thursday.

Homelessness also rose an average of 6 percent for the surveyed cities, with the increase in homeless families far outpacing the number for individuals.

Mayors said the figures showed the depth of problems facing poor and low-income families as the United States slowly recovers from a deep economic downturn and joblessness that was at 8.6 percent last month.

They urged that food and housing programs be defended as the government moved closer to $1.2 trillion in mandatory cuts aimed at reducing a ballooning federal deficit.

The survey "should be a wakeup call for cities involved and the country," Kansas City Mayor Sly James said in a conference call with reporters.

"Here in the richest country of the world we have people who cannot find a place to live and we are failing to address it such that the numbers are increasing, not decreasing."

Eighty-six percent of the cities reported requests for emergency food aid had increased in the last year, the survey by the mayors' group said.

Kansas City showed the sharpest increase, at 40 percent. It was followed by Boston and Salt Lake City, both at 35 percent.

Unemployment led the list of causes of hunger, followed by poverty, low wages and high housing costs.

No survey city expected requests for emergency food aid to drop over the next year, and 93 percent expected a rise.

HOMELESSNESS UP

Forty-two percent of the survey cities reported an increase in homelessness and 19 percent said the number stayed the same.

The number of homeless families was up an average of 16 percent, but the number of unaccompanied homeless people was up less than 1 percent.

Charleston, South Carolina, had by far the biggest increase in homelessness, at 150 percent. Los Angeles was second at 39 percent.

Officials in 64 percent of the cities expected the number of homeless families to increase, and 55 percent of them expected the number of homeless individuals to rise.

The report of rising numbers of hungry and homeless American came after the Census Bureau reported last month that about 48 percent of Americans, or 146 million, were living in poverty or considered low income.

Based on a new supplemental measure designed to provide a fuller portrait of poverty, the Census Bureau said about 97.3 million Americans fell into the low-income category. Another 49.1 million are considered poor.

In another indicator of hunger, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reported this month that 15 percent of the U.S. population, or almost 43.6 million people, took part in its main food program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, in September.

The figure is up almost 8 percent from the year before, and up 77 percent in five years.

The U.S. Conference of Mayors groups mayors from 1,139 cities with populations of 30,000 or more.

(Reporting By Ian Simpson; Editing by Jerry Norton)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
OneOfTheSheep wrote:
There are people who are genuinely needy, clueless, and whose children go hungry while there are those who are quite savvy and “play the system” for all it is worth. Qualifying children can already get few or reduced-cost before and during school and vacations.

If you offer a hamburger or a burrito to one of those people who beg at intersections with a sign “will work for food”, they are not grateful. They may well say “what am I supposed to do with this…I have bills to pay”. We have food banks, etc. that give food commodities away to anybody who drives up.

Would it not be better for cities and towns to offer RESIDENTS “down on their luck” a helping hand, a place an adult or family could go for ONE good, nutritious PREPARED meal a day, NO “take-outs”? Those eating there more than once or twice would be REQUIRED to volunteer appropriately.

Most communities have “available” one or more unoccupied structures that could become such a place for nominal expense. If not, tear down a few condemned buildings and build them with the materials and fixtures. Why woouldn’t local trade groups, Chamber of Commerce, Lions, Kiwanis, etc. help such good cause? Why not “tap” the “deserving unemployed” for the skills and effort to fix that part of our society that seems broken? Renovation, repairs, food pick-up, preparation, etc. could be done by any combination of volunteers, trustees, etc. with a few competent supervisors.

Why wouldn’t local churches pitch in? Use off-duty school buses to make access available to certain “gathering points”. Set up showers, washer-dryers and a place to donate or get used clothes as necessary. Our society is rich in underutilized resources. Isn’t a plan and some action better than endless excuses?

Dec 15, 2011 10:28pm EST  --  Report as abuse
stickwelder wrote:
It seems there are a lot of vacant foreclosed houses decaying in this country, and a lot of homeless families; there may be a simple solution hiding here somewhere. In some communities the banks are paying individuals to care for the home so long as they’re ready to move at a moment’s notice, which not only can improve the bank’s eventual value recovery but improves the economy by giving families debt relief and a home. Heck, a bank could write off the whole value of the mortgages and through the use of tax law get a refund from the government for their unfair tax burden. The details are fuzzy and the concepts potentially flawed, but Dustbowl era migrations and social unrest are two spectres I’d really like not to see in my lifetime.

Dec 16, 2011 11:20am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.