U.S. says Arizona sheriff violated civil rights laws

WASHINGTON/PHOENIX Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:19pm EST

Related Topics

WASHINGTON/PHOENIX Dec 15 (Reuters) - An Arizona sheriff and his deputies violated U.S. civil rights laws by engaging in racial profiling of Latinos and making unlawful arrests in their bid to crack down on illegal immigrants, the U.S. Justice Department said on Thursday.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio's deputies regularly made unlawful stops and arrests of Latinos, the Justice Department said, adding there was also evidence they used excessive force and failed to protect the Hispanic community adequately.

"We found discriminatory policing that was deeply rooted in the culture of the department -- a culture that breeds a systemic disregard for basic constitutional protections," said Thomas Perez, head of the Justice Department's civil rights division.

"In short, MCSO is broken in a number of critical respects," he said, referring to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, whose jurisdiction encompasses Phoenix.

In a separate move, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said she was ending a joint agreement with the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office that allowed its deputies to screen jail inmates for their immigration status.

A defiant Arpaio, who has denied that his department engages in racial profiling, defended his record at his own news conference and accused the Justice Department under President Obama of encouraging illegal immigration.

"By their actions today, President Obama and a band of his merry men might as well erect their own pink neon sign at the Arizona-Mexico border, saying, 'Welcome all illegals to your United States. Our home is your home.'"

Arpaio said, however, that he would cooperate with federal officials.

The Justice Department has given Arpaio until January 4 to agree to negotiations addressing the matter, warning it would seek a court order requiring compliance if his office balked.

The Obama administration previously has filed suit challenging a controversial new Arizona law, backed by Arpaio, requiring police to check the immigration status of anyone they detain and suspect of being in the country illegally.

A federal judge and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals have sided with the Obama administration in putting the disputed provisions of the Arizona statute, SB 1070, on hold. But the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the state's appeal of those rulings.


Critics of SB 1070 have said it would encourage racial profiling by police, a practice the Justice Department has said was endemic to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office.

Specifically, the Justice Department said Arpaio's deputies regularly targeted people of darker skin complexion or who spoke Spanish at local businesses.

In the Justice Department's findings, officials discovered that Latino drivers were four to nine times more likely to be stopped than non-Latinos and that activists who spoke out against the tactics by Arpaio and his deputies were harassed.

Moreover, officers in the county's jails regularly discriminated against those Latino inmates who did not speak English well, according to the Justice Department.

The sheriff's high-profile crackdown on illegal immigrants has helped thrust the issue onto the national political stage, forcing the Obama administration to confront growing concerns about the roughly 11 million people believed to be living in the United States unlawfully.

Arpaio's force has been under investigation by federal authorities since 2008 during the Bush administration. Obama's Justice Department spent months fighting for access to documents and to some of his deputies. Arpaio was interviewed twice during the probe, Perez said.

Perez said a criminal investigation into the sheriff's office was ongoing and declined to elaborate.

Arpaio, who has touted himself as "America's toughest sheriff," has come under fire in the past for creating all-volunteer armed posses to sweep for illegal immigrants in Maricopa County and for policies such as making jail inmates wear pink underwear.

But he has proven popular in conservative Republican circles. Texas Governor Rick Perry sought and gained Arpaio's endorsement in November in a bid to rebut criticism from rival candidates for the Republican presidential nomination that he was too soft on illegal immigration.

The federal government is examining separate allegations that Arpaio's deputies failed to adequately investigate sexual assaults -- a concern emphasized last week by the state's two U.S. senators.

(Editing by Peter Cooney, Steve Gorman and Peter Bohan)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
reddragon696 wrote:
This should certainly come as no great surprise. One of the biggest problems with the Republican Party today is their rampant Racism, Bigotry and Prejudicial treatment of anyone who is not a W.A.S.P. and it is unfortunate that they have so much control over the local Sheriff’s Office making it that much easier for them to spew out their hatred. The Republican Party is primarily responsible for the majority of the Narrow Minded Attitudes of Americans today. We seem to forget that our country was founded by Immigrants and it goes against our National Conscience that we so readily endorse the blatant Hypocritical attitude of Society’s Conservatives. It appears like the Republican Party and the Ultra Right-Wing conservatives of America absolutely MUST HAVE someone that they can denigrate in order to ‘feel good’ about themselves. It used to be Gays that were denigrated in such a manner but now that Society and the Government are finally beginning to admit that Gays are entitled to the Equal Rights the U.S. Constitution guarantees to ALL citizens the Repubs and their Ultra Conservative followers have now chosen to pick on the so-called ‘Illegal Immigrants’. Once Society is educated to the point that they recognize that America really should be more accepting of immigrants they will have to find someone else to put down and it will be interesting to see exactly what group of people they will choose for this ill-favoured honour.

Dec 16, 2011 5:10am EST  --  Report as abuse
That’s too bad. The racist scum should focus on Blacks and Muslims more than hard working Latinos. They need some “other” subgroup to practice their inbred ignorance. Nazism comes to mind. If left unchecked Arpaio’s concentration camps would employ gas chambers soon. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness–” What a farce!

Dec 16, 2011 9:30am EST  --  Report as abuse
911014ever wrote:
I live in Arizona, while i don’t always agree with Arpaio…I know he is doing a great job. Dealing with illegals isn’t easy.
whateverforever are you kidding, I haven’t heard such a racist statement like yours in a long time and glad I haven’t,”the racist scum should focus on Blacks and Muslims”… you are a danger to all who have a clue. You have NONE!You want to live in my country in my state, do it like everyone else…if not get out and go back to where you came!!!! That black, white, red or green, do it right or GO!

Dec 16, 2011 11:50am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.