Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
Tornado chasers
Storm chasers brave danger and debris as they try to capture photos of tornadoes' destructive power. Slideshow
Running while blind
Blind or visually impaired students compete in blind track and field tournament. Slideshow
Sponsored Links
CBO raises TARP cost estimate to $34 billion
(Reuters) - The Congressional Budget Office said on Friday it was raising its estimate of the cost of the Troubled Asset Relief Program to $34 billion, primarily because of a drop in the market value of government investments in GM and AIG.
The new estimate is $15 billion more than the CBO calculated in its previous report.
But it is still "well below what was originally envisaged" when Congress created the $700 billion fund in 2008 to aid banks threatened by a rapidly unfolding financial crisis, it said.
The CBO's latest analysis reflects transactions completed, outstanding and anticipated as of November 15.
It estimated the cost of assistance to American International Group, aid to the automotive industry and grant programs aimed at avoiding home foreclosures at $59 billion.
However, the federal government will earn about $25 billion on other transactions it took to help financial institutions, reducing the cost of TARP to $34 billion, the CBO said.
In addition, only $428 billion of the originally authorized $700 billion will be disbursed under TARP, the CBO estimated.
"When the program was created, the U.S. financial system was in a precarious condition, and the transactions envisioned and ultimately undertaken engendered substantial financial risk for the federal government," it said.
"Nevertheless, the costs directly associated with the TARP, when taken in isolation, have been toward the low end of the range of possible outcomes anticipated when the program was launched," the CBO said.
That is partly because funds invested, loaned, or granted to participating institutions through the Federal Reserve and other government programs besides the TARP helped limit costs, the agency said.
(Reporting By Doug Palmer; Editing by Dan Grebler)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
“Money is always there but the pockets change; it is not in the same pockets after a change, and that is all there is to say about money.”
If the US defaults on bonds, the US has the money that would have been paid if they did not default.
If the US pays the bonds at maturity, the bondholder has the money.
There are 7 billion people on earth now and more coming.
What does it matter who has the money?
Shakespear: “ What care I how fair she be, if she be not fair to me?
My opinion: “What care I which pockets are full, If mine are empty.
Here is the question…
Can a no-count worthless politician take money from the pocket of a yet unborn person, and enforce laws requiring that person to pay? I doubt it.
How immoral is that?
Obama and his predecessors have enslaved future generations with huge debts.
There is a 100% risk that the future generations will shrug off this nonsense.
Manage that risk! If you can.!
He was all for it. His vote:
Obama (D-IL), Yea




Follow Reuters