Romney still making millions from Bain: report

WASHINGTON Mon Dec 19, 2011 5:13am EST

Republican U.S. presidential contender Mitt Romney addresses the crowd at a town hall meeting in Charleston, December 17, 2011.   REUTERS/Randall Hill

Republican U.S. presidential contender Mitt Romney addresses the crowd at a town hall meeting in Charleston, December 17, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Randall Hill

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican White House hopeful Mitt Romney receives millions of dollars a year in a retirement agreement with Bain Capital, nearly 13 years after he left the private equity firm he helped start, the New York Times said on Monday.

In the final deal of his private equity career, Romney negotiated an agreement with his former partners that has paid him a share of Bain's profits ever since, bringing his family millions in income each year and bolstering the fortune that has helped finance his political aspirations, the paper said.

After Romney left Bain, the company grew into a global investing behemoth, buying and restructuring companies. His retirement agreement, the Times noted, may expose him to criticism that while pursing a career in public life, he has grown wealthier partly from Bain laying off workers at companies it has bought - a charge that routinely resurfaces on the campaign trail.

A second point of controversy could be that his Bain profits may qualify for a lower tax rate than ordinary income under a tax provision favorable to private equity managers - a point of contention in fierce arguments over whether tax rates on the wealthy should be raised.

Romney is a leading candidate to become the Republican nominee to challenge President Barack Obama next November.

He has been highlighting his business experience, saying it gives him a better understanding than the president and his Republican rivals of how to energize the U.S. economy and create jobs. At the same time, he has deflected criticism of layoffs caused by private equity deals by noting he left Bain in 1999.


The Times said records and interviews show that in the years since then he has benefited from at least a few Bain deals that resulted in upheaval for companies, workers and communities.

One deal involved KB Toys, a Pittsfield, Massachusetts, company that one of Bain's partnerships bought in 2000. The Times said that three years later, when Romney was governor of that state, Bain began laying off thousands of employees.

Bain also helped lead the private equity purchase of the big radio station operator Clear Channel Communications, a deal that eventually resulted in 2,500 job cuts.

Since Romney's payouts come partly from Bain's share of profits on its customers' investments, that income probably qualifies for the 15 percent tax rate on capital gains rather than the 35 percent wealthy taxpayers pay on ordinary income, the Times said.

The Internal Revenue Service allows investment managers to pay this lower rate on profits, known in the industry as "carried interest." Such options are not available to the ordinary taxpayer.

Spokesmen for Bain and Romney were not immediately available for comment on the report, published overnight in New York.

The newspaper said that Romney had declined to release his tax returns, while his campaign refused to say what tax rate he paid on his Bain earnings. It said a Bain spokesman declined to comment on the retirement agreement, citing confidentiality.

"This was a typical market deal. Bain Capital has no incentive to overpay Governor Romney, and they didn't," Andrea Saul, a spokeswoman for Romney, was quoted as telling the paper.

While some former business associates said they considered the retirement deal generous, others said Romney might have had even more from Bain had he not wanted a quick move into public life. "He made a very sweet deal, he had a very good exit," one former Bain partner told the Times.

"But my guess is, given the actual economic value of Bain Capital at the time, Mitt walked away with less than he could have if he did not take into account the adverse publicity and attention that a battle with former partners would have caused if he had negotiated and played hardball."

According to the newspaper, in 1999 Bain had about $4 billion in assets under management, 100 or so employees and a single office, in Boston. In 2005, Bain had over $21 billion in its funds. Today, Bain manages about $66 billion overall, with 900 employees and 10 offices in six countries.

(Reporting by Philip Barbara; Editing by Alastair Macdonald)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (12)
matthewslyman wrote:
> “One deal involved KB Toys, a Pittsfield, Massachusetts, company that one of Bain’s partnerships bought in 2000. The Times said that three years later, when Romney was governor of that state, Bain began laying off thousands of employees.”

If Romney had been effectively in control of Bane Capital behind-the-scenes, do you think this would have happened during his tenure in Massachusetts? NO WAY! He would have pulled all the strings he could, not to let this happen.

Therefore, the tarring of Romney with personal responsibility for any Bane Capital job losses since his departure, are tenuous at best. It’s not fair to attack Romney in this way.

As for any job losses attributable to Bane projects he worked on, that’s fair game in my opinion, as long as the big picture is examined. Were those companies profitable in the long-term? Or dying a slow death? Did Bane’s work profiteer from carpet-bagging and market manipulation, or were they merely accelerating the natural market processes of “survival of the fittest”, and helping workers who would otherwise have wound up in a dead-end industry to get some decent severance pay and retraining instead? These are the questions that need to be answered.

Dec 19, 2011 5:15am EST  --  Report as abuse
powerwhip wrote:
Sweet! Millions in income every year for the last 12 years for sitting on his rear, we all need a deal like that. And he wants to be President why? surely not to protect his lower tax rate. It’s a great country to be wealthy in. Thank goodness the GOP front runner is somebody that can relate to the common middle class. Not!

Dec 19, 2011 7:48am EST  --  Report as abuse
txgadfly wrote:
More damaging by far is the question of how much he has profited from the export of American jobs to other countries. In other words, how involved in the “globalization” of the economy is he?

“Globalization” is a dirty word because it is a very dirty business. The entire thing depends on manipulating the dollar to such a level where the export of jobs and production is profitable. The value of the dollar is largely controlled by Government policy. Putting a “globalization” advocate in Government is like putting a convicted child molester in charge of a day care center.

Dec 19, 2011 8:10am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.