Deutsche Telekom could be forced into arms of Sprint

FRANKFURT Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:37pm EST

T-Mobile logo is ready to be placed on a former Era Mobile outlet in Warsaw June 1, 2011. Deutsche Telekom's Polish mobile arm said its rebranding costs could surpass 100 million zlotys ($36.4 million), as the German group puts its mark on the asset it fought over for a decade.  REUTERS/Kacper Pempel

T-Mobile logo is ready to be placed on a former Era Mobile outlet in Warsaw June 1, 2011. Deutsche Telekom's Polish mobile arm said its rebranding costs could surpass 100 million zlotys ($36.4 million), as the German group puts its mark on the asset it fought over for a decade.

Credit: Reuters/Kacper Pempel

FRANKFURT (Reuters) - Deutsche Telekom may be forced into a tie-up of its sub-scale U.S. wireless unit with Sprint Nextel after a $39 billion deal with AT&T collapsed.

AT&T said on Monday it had dropped its bid for T-Mobile USA, bowing to fierce regulatory opposition and leaving both companies scrambling for alternatives.

While Deutsche Telekom is now walking away with a $6 billion breakup package, its chief executive Rene Obermann has lost a lot of time and will now have to invest in the U.S. market or find a new way to exit the country, an option analysts regard as unlikely.

T-Mobile USA "is just crying out for a merger with Sprint. That's the only long-term solution for Deutsche Telekom," Will Draper, head of telecoms research at Espirito Santo, said.

T-Mobile USA, a growth engine in its early days but now a run-down asset, is badly lacking in the spectrum it needs to build a network capable of handling the vast data volumes that U.S. consumers and businesses use on smartphones.

Bleeding money and losing customers, it ranks fourth among U.S. carriers behind AT&T, Verizon and Sprint.

Obermann offered no detailed plan of how the company will bounce back from the collapse of talks with AT&T, only assuring investors he was working on a long-term plan for T-Mobile USA.

"In the long term, we need more spectrum and network capacity. We are working on that. But we will not speculate about any inorganic steps or deals," he told reporters during a conference call.

He also said it was incomprehensible to him that U.S. regulators blocked the transaction.

Deutsche Telekom shares closed down 0.6 percent at 8.83 euros, the only decliner in the blue-chip DAX index, on investor concern the company is back at square one with its American problem child.

Before talks with AT&T were announced in March, sources said Deutsche Telekom was looking at a potential deal with Sprint. Reportedly, it was considering a sale of T-Mobile USA to Sprint in exchange for a stake in the combined company.

But instead of pursuing a tie-up with Sprint, Obermann bet all his chips on a deal with AT&T.

"Whilst a merger with Sprint is probably the best long-term strategic option in the United States, there would be pain for Deutsche Telekom in the near term, starting with the need to invest in Sprint/T-Mobile USA," Espirito Santo said.

Deutsche Telekom would likely get a stake in a combined entity in such a deal rather than cash, which would still leave it saddled with a company needing investments.

Sprint, which has itself been losing subscribers for years, recently went to debt markets to raise $4 billion to finance its own debt maturities, a costly network upgrade and hefty expenses from its agreement with Apple Inc to sell the iPhone.

Sprint has said that it still needs to raise up to $3 billion in vendor financing for its network upgrade.

Robert W. Baird analyst Will Power cautioned that it was not clear whether regulators would permit such a deal.

SPECTRUM SQUEEZE

Adding to its woes, Deutsche Telekom missed out on spectrum sales in the United States while it was busy negotiating the T-Mobile mega-merger, leaving it even more vulnerable.

Carriers like AT&T, Verizon Wireless and Vodafone, have clamored for access to more airwaves to stave off a looming spectrum crunch that would mean clogged networks, more dropped calls and slower connection speeds for wireless customers.

As part of the breakup with AT&T, Deutsche Telekom will receive mobile spectrum in cities such as Los Angeles, Dallas and Boston, in addition to about $3 billion in cash.

While that will go toward helping T-Mobile USA grow, Obermann said it will not solve the long-term problem.

"One imaginable option would be a network partnership with Clearwire," LBBW analyst Stefan Borscheid said, adding he would also not rule out that Deutsche Telekom could find a financial investor willing to take T-Mobile USA off its hands.

Analysts have said a collapse of the deal could also be a catalyst for the sale of Deutsche Telekom's stake in Britain's biggest mobile company Everything Everywhere, unless it manages to clinch a deal with another U.S. operator.

(Correcting share price and change in paragraph 10)

(Additional reporting by Georgina Prodhan, Harro ten Wolde and Sinead Carew; Editing by Erica Billingham and Mike Nesbit)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (12)
TyroneJ wrote:
Deutsche Telekom could try something novel for “Plan B”. Try reinvesting the profits of T-Mobile back into T-Mobile, instead of sucking them back to Germany.

Dec 20, 2011 7:38am EST  --  Report as abuse
docroc wrote:
“vast data volumes that U.S. consumers and businesses use on smartphones.”

Never mind data, they can’t even handle voice anymore! I was a satisfied customer for 6 years — meaning that, in the context of their lower-than-average pricing, I thought I was getting good value for what I was paying. But, when I (and my other family plan members) stopped being able to make/receive calls in areas formerly available to me, I began to question whether T-Mobile could continue to be my carrier.

I won’t even go into the billing hassle I had after quitting (without a contract) and T-Mobile’s horrible customer service when I tried to resolve it.

Dec 20, 2011 7:46am EST  --  Report as abuse
jdman wrote:
I don’t think re-investing is a smart option for the company. I’d use my resources on finding a new buyer unless the re-investment yields to a plan similar to IBM back in the 90′s/00′s (where-in they were unable to find a buyer). In respect to re-investing, would there be any consumer confidence to purchase their cell service or rather go to a competitor where service is stable? A quick re-assessment is essential to figure out weather to re-invest (type 1 test) or to be bought out for less than what AT&T had to offer (type 2 test). And why wouldn’t AT&T backout now? I’m sure they’ve already had some organic growth with the speculative talks of the acqutition.

Dec 20, 2011 8:02am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.