Monitors may be in Syria by end-December, says League chief

CAIRO Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:34pm EST

CAIRO (Reuters) - The head of the Arab League said on Tuesday that monitors could be in Syria before the end of the month to assess whether Damascus is implementing an Arab plan to end a bloody crackdown on protests after weeks of stalling.

Galvanized by a soaring death toll after Syria turned troops and tanks on anti-government protests, Arab states have pushed Damascus to let in a team of about 150 observers to witness what is happening on the ground.

"I can say with some assurance, but not certainty, that before the end of next week they will all be there," Arab League Secretary-General Nabil Elaraby told Reuters.

The mission is the first of its kind for an organization characterized until recently by uncritical support for its member states' mostly autocratic rulers.

"It is a completely new mission, an uncharted mission in every sense of the word and, as with every agreement in the world, it depends on implementation in good faith," Elaraby said.

The government of President Bashar al-Assad agreed at the start of November to a plan demanding an end to fighting, the withdrawal of troops from residential areas, the release of prisoners and the start of a dialogue with the opposition.

But for six weeks it baulked at letting in monitors to assess implementation while the death toll climbed. It finally signed a protocol on monitors, which is renewable after a month, on Monday.


A small advance team, led by a top League official, will head to Damascus on Thursday to prepare for the mission, Elaraby said. Once the monitors are in place, the assessment on whether Syria is in compliance could be made swiftly.

"In a week's time, from the start of the operation, we will know. We don't need a month," he said.

The monitoring operation will be led by a Sudanese general with experience of peacekeeping operations and will include members from Arab states and non-governmental organizations. Members of the media will also accompany them.

Elaraby, 76, a seasoned Egyptian diplomat who was picked to head the Cairo-based League in May, said Gulf states agreed on Monday to send 60 monitors, making a total of about 150 so far.

The monitors will expect freedom of communication and movement, including access to prisons and hospitals, he said.

After Syria for weeks showed no signs of acting on the plan, Arab states announced a range of sanctions on financial dealings with Syria, and travel restrictions.

Those measures will stay in place until monitors give their assessment in daily and weekly reports that will be shown to, but not vetted by, Syria, Elaraby said.

The measures were "adopted by the Arab ministerial meeting and this is the body that has the authority to end the sanctions," he said.

Elaraby said the League had rejected earlier Syrian demands for amendments that he said would have changed the substance of the mission, and that later amendments secured by Syria had not been substantive.

"They tried to portray it as if it has major changes, I won't comment on this," he said, adding that once the League had ensured the nature of the mission would not be affected, "a word here or a word there will not change anything."


Elaraby said he had been assured by Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad, when he signed the protocol, that Syria had removed military units from most residential areas and would clear the rest before monitors arrived.

Qatar, which led efforts to push Syria to agree to the plan, had warned Syria last week that Arab states could ask the U.N. Security Council to step in and adopt the plan.

"This is an Arab operation, decided upon by the council of ministers of the Arab League. But we are keeping the United Nations informed," Elaraby said, adding that he had written to the U.N. secretary-general to inform him that Syria had signed the protocol.

The League for decades avoided taking action against member states, with rare exceptions such as the dispatch of military peacekeepers to Lebanon when war erupted there in the 1970s.

But it has now been spurred into action by the 'Arab Spring'. First it called for a no-fly zone during an uprising in Libya that led to a U.N. Security Council resolution and then NATO air strikes.

Now the League has imposed sanctions on Syria, but Arab officials say they do not want foreign military intervention.

Elaraby said he had sought a role in Yemen, but that Gulf states had taken the lead to deal with a revolt there. He also said he would visit Bahrain, where protests have also erupted.

"Wherever there is a problem, we try to intervene, but we cannot force ourselves. We don't have the enforcement measures that the United Nations has. It has to be with the consent of every country," said Elaraby, a former Egyptian ambassador to the United Nations.

Elaraby has appointed a commission to make proposals to restructure parts of the League to adapt to the new demands, though any expansion of its powers or change in its structure will need the agreement of all 22 member states.

(Editing by Jon Boyle)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
phuyayyay wrote:
By the end of December, that will mean Assad’s thugs will have the opportunity to kill another 200 of more citizens. My guess is this Arab group will see noting and accomplish nothing. If I were a Syrian protestor, I would surround any observer, if they have the nerve to go out on the street. Then I would start a protest and see if the Syrian troops were dumb enough to fire on the crowd and risk killing one of the visiting Arabs. I say yes.

Dec 20, 2011 1:28pm EST  --  Report as abuse
mcanterel wrote:
to phuyayyay:
So you swallowed the pill on Libya, and you swallow again on Syria? despite seeing with your own eyes what happened to Libya : a manufactured hypothetical massacre became a real one, but the perpetrators are not the ones YOU expected: the rebels (should we drop the mask and called them traitors?)
Yelling, jumping, throwing numbers, do not make a massacre. The citizens you are talking about (I am one of them) are fed up with the lie. Leave us alone, do you get that? Thugs, traitors, call them the way you want, based in Turkey, financed in Qatar, want my country in civil war. They have secured the help of the most formidable propaganda machine on earth (yes, that is your media), and the usual army of useful idiots that keep on swallowing pill after pill (Irak, Libya, Iran, Syria, Gaza, you name it, we are easy targets, we don’t “look” like Western “democrats”).
Hey, here is a challenge: how come the vociferous chacals after Syria are named USA (Irak aggression: the biggest war crime of this century, but no prosecution, not even a media frenzy), France and the UK (the ex colonizers of many of these countries), and Saudi Arabia and Qatar (the most democratic and open societies on earth, your friends in the West!)
The Syrian rebels? A bunch of traitors!

Dec 20, 2011 2:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
mcanterel wrote:
The Syrian troops are also Syrian people. Assad is not Syria. We should know the trick by now: dehumanitize the opponent and then rain the bombs on the country (Irak equated with Saddam) or throw it into civil war (Libya equated with Kaddafi). Except that the real target invariably is the people.
The pattern of propaganda is so evident, a child should be able to see through it: for months now, Assad’s this, Assad’s that. Those are Syrian citizens you are talking about, not just faceless Assad’s men and women… Most Syrians are behind the current regime, and if not they do not want to change it by war, and certainly not a Western war…

Dec 20, 2011 2:18pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.