The dome of the Capitol is reflected in a puddle in Washington February 17, 2012.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Another debt ceiling debacle could sink the economy

Last year's Congressional debt standoff hurt consumer confidence more than the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Betsey Johnson and Justin Wolfers write. This time could be worse.  Read more at Counterparties  

U.S. officials split on "hands free" ban for drivers

Related Topics

Wed Dec 21, 2011 6:04pm EST

(Reuters) - In a public split, the Obama administration's pointman on transportation sharply disagreed with a proposal by the top U.S. transportation safety investigator for a ban on hands-free calling while driving.

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, who has made distracted driving his signature safety issue, said the focus should be on texting and hand-held cell calls, not fast-growing new technology that allows drivers to talk while keeping their hands on the wheel.

"That is not the big problem in America," LaHood told reporters. "Most people don't put Bluetooth or Sync in their cars because they can't afford it. Everybody has a cell phone in their hand and it's held up to their ear while they're driving."

National Transportation Safety Board Chairman Deborah Hersman issued a sweeping proposal last week for states to outlaw cell use while driving, including hands-free devices, except in emergencies. Use of motorist assist programs, such as OnStar by General Motors Co, would still be permitted.

Hersman's board has no rule-making authority, but its recommendations can carry weight with lawmakers and regulators. Safety experts say any blanket ban was not likely because it would be difficult to enforce.

LaHood has discussed hands-free technology with auto company executives, but has never asked them to stop putting it in vehicles.

"Our efforts are good laws and good enforcement, and personal responsibility," LaHood said. "We'll work with anyone who wants to get on board."

Distracted driving killed more than 3,000 people in the United States last year, Transportation Department figures show.

Auto companies are heavily investing in hands-free wireless products, like Bluetooth or Ford Motor Co's Sync communications and entertainment system. They are available in most 2012 models as standard or optional equipment.

Consumer experts say hand-free systems have become decision-makers for some consumers, especially younger buyers.

(Reporting By John Crawley; editing by Andre Grenon)

Related Quotes and News

Company
Price
Related News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
jhadjane wrote:
I am not saying that distracted drivers are not a problem. But in my opinion, the excuse “I ain’t got no money for a Bluetooth” or wired headset is absurd with prices in the 40 dollar range for Bluetooth and the 10 dollar range for a wired headset. This is unenforceable considering the vast numbers of mobile phone users and is another power grab by the incredibly bold Obama nanny-state.

Dec 21, 2011 6:10pm EST  --  Report as abuse
reddragon696 wrote:
Since Transportation Secretary Ray Lahood is so much against banning Hands-Free Devices in vehicles despite the growing evidence that they are just as dangerous as hand held devices as far as distracting drivers enough to cause accidents, he should be required to contact every single family that loses someone due to using these devices and explain to them why he feels their loved ones are not important enough to be protected from being injured or killed in an accident as a result of these devices still being allowed in vehicles. Maybe if he sees the agony and heartache in people’s faces as they are told of their loved-ones death he would think differently about allowing such a dangerous situation to continue unabated. It simply amazes me that anyone would feel that they are so important that they can not wait until they are stopped before talking on a cell phone. How people can be so self-centered is unbelievable.

Dec 22, 2011 7:46am EST  --  Report as abuse
Hands-free devices may address audio communication (phone calls) but they are not applicable with visual communication, such as email and texting. There needs to be an increase in awareness of how dangerous it is when a driver glances at the phone to read or compose messages.

That said, I am dead set against Transportation Dept having any technological ability to shut down the device when in motion because it will not be able to detect driver from passenger. This would unnecessarily infringe upon the freedoms of the innocent (non driver).

Dec 22, 2011 12:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.