Iran to fire long-range missiles in drill: agency

TEHRAN Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:03pm EST

Related Video

Video

Iran's war games

Fri, Dec 30 2011

Related Topics

Related Interactive

TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran will fire long-range missiles during a naval drill in the Gulf on Saturday, a semi-official news agency reported, a show of force at a time when Iran has threatened to close shipping lanes if the West imposes sanctions on its oil exports.

Iran threatened on Tuesday to stop the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz if it became the target of an oil export embargo over its nuclear ambitions, a move that could trigger military conflict with countries dependent on Gulf oil.

"The Iranian navy will test several kinds of its missiles, including its long-range missiles, in the Persian Gulf on Saturday," Admiral Mahmoud Mousavi, deputy commander of the Iranian navy, told Fars news agency.

During military drills in 2009, Iran test-fired its surface-to-surface Shahab-3 missile, said to be capable of reaching reach Israel and U.S. bases in the Middle East.

Washington has expressed concern about Tehran's missiles, which include the Shahab-3 strategic intermediate range ballistic missile with a range of up to 1,000 km (625 miles), the Ghadr-1 with an estimated 1,600 km range and a Shahab-3 variant known as Sajjil-2 with a range of up to 2,400 km.

Iran began a 10-day naval drill in the Gulf last Saturday to show its resolve to counter any attack by foes such as Israel or the United States.

Iranian media have said the exercise differed from previous ones in terms of "the vastness of the area of action and the military equipment and tactics that are being employed."

The United States and Israel have said they do not rule out military action against Iran if diplomacy fails to resolve a dispute over the country's nuclear program, which Tehran says is peaceful but which the West says is a cover to build a bomb.

HURTING ECONOMY

Iran has said it would respond to any attack by targeting U.S. interests in the region and Israel, as well as by closing the Strait of Hormuz.

The U.S. Navy, whose Fifth Fleet is based in the Gulf island of Bahrain, said it would not accept any Iranian disruption of the flow of oil in the strategic waterway.

"The firing of missiles is the final part of the navy drill," said Mousavi. "The final phase of the drill is to prepare the navy for confronting the enemy in war situations."

Navy commander Rear Admiral Ali Rastegari also said "medium-range, short-range missiles and smart torpedoes" would be test-fired.

Experts say Iran might be able to close the Hormuz Strait temporarily, but that such a move would damage its own economy.

Tensions with the West have risen since the U.N. nuclear watchdog reported on November 8 that Iran appears to have worked on designing an atomic bomb and may still be pursuing research to that end.

Iran denies this and says it needs nuclear technology to generate electricity to meet growing domestic demand.

Tehran has been hit by four rounds of U.N. sanctions since 2006 as well as U.S. and European Union sanctions over its refusal to suspend sensitive nuclear work.

Some analysts say sanctions on Iran's vital energy sector might push the clerical establishment to change its nuclear policy. Over 60 percent of state revenue is from crude exports and most of Iran's petrol imports are shipped through Hormuz.

"Iranian leaders are worried about sanctions on oil exports ... That is why they are making such threats," said analyst Hossein Kazemi. "Sanctions on oil income will paralyze the country."

The Islamic Republic's leadership has repeatedly brushed off the impact of sanctions on the oil-dependent economy.

(Reporting by Parisa Hafezi; Editing by Alistair Lyon)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
jaham wrote:
I feel pretty confident in my belief that we will be invading Iran in 2012.

We have effectively put them in check with these oil and central bank sanctions. Their economy will be cut in half overnight. They will likely respond militarily, as they are threatening, and that is exactly what the United States wants – checkmate.

Dec 30, 2011 10:45am EST  --  Report as abuse
W-DS wrote:
Its impossible for Iran to attack first, or begin the hostilities — We backed the MEK, who murdered dozens of Iranian police officers, so we initiated the first attack. Not to mention the sanctions/other threats and actions from us in the past several years.

They may retaliate eventually, but not attack us directly, like we havent them.

They know how we “play” and how we have to portray any attacks from us as retaliatory/in defense, so I have a feeling they will allow us to get away with a fair bit more, until in the end we get bored because its failing, and we end up attacking them.

Iran is no Iraq, South Korea, Gaza, Lebannon, or any other of the easily baited countries; They know for every attack against them by the west/western backed entities, all it does is bring their people in line, and give the govt in Tehran more legitimacy…for its them who suffer from the sanctions, and hostile attacks from us/those we back.

Dec 30, 2011 11:43am EST  --  Report as abuse
BCerentano wrote:
As a warning, the US should ‘test fire’ their own missiles; landing them just off the Iranian coast.

Dec 30, 2011 11:56am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus